Salmonellosis in swine: Clinical perspectives

Minkyung Shim1Sanghyun Hong1Min-Jae Seok1Hyeun Bum Kim1*

Abstract

Salmonella is one of the most important food-borne zoonotic pathogens, causing acute or chronic digestive diseases such as enteritis. The acute form of enteritis is common in young pigs of 2 - 4 months of age. The main symptoms include high fever (41 - 42℃), loss of appetite, and increased mortality within 2 - 4 days of onset of the disease. It is often the cause of increasing mortality, decreasing growth rate and reducing feed efficiency of piglets. In the case of chronic enteritis in pigs, the main symptom is weight loss due to the continuing severe diarrhea. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis are typical pig adapted serotypes, which cause one of four major syndromes: enteric fever, enterocolitis/diarrhea, bacteremia and chronic asymptomatic carriage. These syndromes cause a huge economic burden to swine industry by reducing production. Therefore, it is necessary that swine industries should strive to decrease Salmonellosis in pigs in order to reduce economic losses. There are several measures, such as vaccination to prevent salmonellosis, that are implemented differently from country to country. For the treatment of Salmonella, ongoing antibiotic treatment is needed. However constant doses of antibiotics can be a problem because of antibiotic resistance. Therefore, the focus should be made more on prevention than treatment. In this review, we addressed the basic information about Salmonella, route of infection, clinical symptoms, and prevention of Salmonellosis.

Keyword



Introduction

Salmonella is a non-lactose fermenting bacteria belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae. Salmonella has fimbriae and peritrichous flagella, and it is a noncapsulated, gram-negative, short rod bacterium. Facultatively anaerobic Salmonella grows on defined media without special growth factors (Timoney et al., 1988). However, the quantification and isolation of Salmonella from feces is somewhat prone to failure since Salmonella is often less abundantly present among competitor bacterial species in feces. Multiple enrichments using specially formulated selective and differential media for the isolation of Salmonella have been devised in order to overcome this constraint. The two most useful of these are Xylose-Lysine-Deoxycholate (XLD) and xylose-lysine-tergitol (XLT) agars that have replaced MacConkey agar. In addition, the isolation of Salmonella in fecal contents using Rappaport-Vassiliadis R10 and tetrathionate broth has been effective. The optimum growth temperature for Salmonella is 37℃ (Timoney et al., 1988; Busse, 1995; Nye et al., 2002; Korsak et al., 2004).

It has been known that medically important salmonella may be considered as a single species, known as Salmonella enterica, which has more than 2,500 different serotypes (Murray et al., 1999). Clinically familiar names, such as Salmonella typhimurium or Salmonella serotype typhimurium, which would be renamed Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium are being used in most medical laboratories (Timoney et al., 1988; Hohmann, 2001).

Salmonella serovars commonly found in swine are a major human health problem in the world. The most common serotypes associated with human Salmonella infections include following 4 serotypes, S enterica serovar Typhimurium, S. Heidelberg, S. Agona, and S. Infantis (Foley and Nayak, 2008). As a common food borne diseases in humans, Salmonellosis is related to contaminated food, such as pork products that are an important source of Salmonella infection in humans. It has been shown that 9.6% of the pork in United States retail stores was contaminated with Salmonella (Duffy et al., 2000; Andino and Hanning, 2015).

The reduction of the opportunistic pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract of swine, including Salmonella, has been proposed as one of mechanisms for antibiotic-mediated growth promotion (AGPs). Nevertheless, it is not clear if the use of AGPs results in lower load or carriage of Salmonella (Dibner and Richards, 2005). If it is true, the reduction in opportunistic pathogens by AGPs is of importance in terms of accessing the mechanisms of growth promotion by AGPs as well as its relationship with public health.

Transmission, prevalence and clinical symptoms

Transmission

Transmission of Salmonella between pigs can occur through the fecal-oral and intranasal routes, involving colonization and dissemination of the gastrointestinal tract and organs such as lungs and tonsils. Also, airborne or direct nose-to-nose contact could increase the possibility of transmission of Salmonella in intensive pig production systems (Oliveira et al., 2007). In addition, several potential risk factors for Salmonella infection, such as poor management and hygiene have been identified (Table 1) (Wales et al., 2013). In general, all ages of pigs are susceptible to Salmonella infection, however, weaned and growing-finishing pigs are more prone to Salmonella infection (Meurens et al., 2009).

Prevalence

The prevalence of Salmonella typhimurium was higher (62.5%) than other Salmonella serovars, and the prevalence of Salmonella infection was 32.9% both in finishing pigs and weaned pigs in India (Kumar et al., 2014). Young pigs are more susceptible to Salmonellosis because of immature intestinal function, concurrent diseases, and changes of surrounding environment (Wales et al., 2013; Aiello et al., 2016). Of these reasons, it is advised that swine farmers should focus on both improved hygiene and husbandry of young piglets to prevent Salmonella infection.

Non-typhoidal salmonella (NTS) illness accounts for approximately one million cases in the United States alone (Scallan et al., 2011; Tamang et al., 2015). Moreover, Salmonella was the second most commonly reported zoonoses in the European Union and was the third most common reason of foodborne diseases in Korea. In Spain, García-Feliz et al. reported 43.1% of prevalence of Salmonella in finishing pig herds (Garcia-Feliz et al., 2007; Tadee et al., 2014). However, the prevalence of Salmonella was 5.58% in fattening pigs in Germany (Visscher et al., 2011; Tadee et al., 2014).

S. typhimurium is most commonly attributed to swine Salmonellosis in Europe. It becomes a source of contamination of pork products, and it causes tremendous economic and animal welfare costs (Arce et al., 2014). In the pig farms of the Tarai region of Uttarakhand, India, the most prevalent Salmonella serotype was Salmonella typhimurium that accounts for about 62.5% of known serotypes (Kumar et al., 2014).

S. Choleraesuis is especially adapted to pigs and is rarely detected in other species, however, it can also cause systemic infection in humans (Chang et al., 2013). Salmonella serovar Choleraesuis var. Kunzendorf was the main cause of S. Choleraesuis outbreaks in pigs in Europe (Pedersen et al., 2015). Nevertheless, S. Choleraesuis infection in humans is not frequent in Canada or United Kingdom (Barrell, 1987; Briggs and Fratamico, 1999; Onyango et al., 2014). Interestingly, it was the second most common cause of human Salmonellosis in Taiwan (Chen et al., 1999; Onyango et al., 2014).

Clinical symptoms

The main route of Salmonella infection in humans is ingestion of contaminated food products or direct contact. It makes livestock species a potential source of Salmonellosis (Zhao et al., 2006a; Clothier et al., 2010). In swine, Salmonella infections such as S. Choleraesuis or S. Typhimurium produce a variety of disease syndromes including septicemia, enteritis, and respiratory disease (Boyen et al., 2008; Foley et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2009; Vigo et al., 2009; Clothier et al., 2010). Piglets are especially vulnerable to Salmonella infection and this leads to high morbidity and mortality (Schierack et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2014).

Table 1. Potential risk factors for Salmonella infection (Wales et al., 2013).

Type

Possible Sources

Housing

Type of pen (slatted, push = through, straw yard)

Management

Number of staff

Number of pigs on farm

Time as a pig farm

Age groups housed separately

Feed source

Sick pens

Reintegration of recovered pigs

Bedding source

Bedding type

Feeder/drinker systems

Biosecurity/hygiene

Staff contact with other pigs

Visitors who have contact with other pigs

Water supply (mains or borehole)

Drainage

Presence of wildlife species

Proximity of waterways, scrubland, pig wastes, cattle wastes, or sewage treatment/landfill sites

Feed storage (capacity and sealed/open bins)

Presence of biosecurity measures (boot dips, well wash, and visitor/staff clothing)

Pigs loaded at perimeter

Site contained within perimeter fence

Rodent controls

Disinfectant: type and frequency

Infections with S. Typhisuis and S. Choleraesuis usually result in swine typhoid, characterized by a severe systemic disease that may result in enteric and fatal systemic disease (Gray et al., 1996; Lichtensteiger and Vimr, 2003; Chiu et al., 2004; Chiu et al., 2005; Ku et al., 2005; Nishio et al., 2005; Zhao et al., 2006b; Boyen et al., 2008).

The main sign of S. Typhimurium, which is most commonly found in pigs, is usually diarrhea. However, S. Typhimurium infection in young pigs can cause significant disease such as increase of rectal temperature and occurrences of S. Typhimurium in the jejunum, cecum, tonsil, and mesenteric lymph node (Tanaka et al., 2010; Yin et al., 2014). Pigs can be asymptomatic with S. Typhimurium present in their tonsils, gut and gut-associated lymphoid tissues, and they can become Salmonella carriers (Berends et al., 1996; Verbrugghe et al., 2011). When pigs are infected with S. Typhimurium, they suffer from enterocolitis which is one of the clinical signs of S. Typhimurium infection. Those pigs can also become chronic carriers (Nollet et al., 2005; Gradassi et al., 2013).

S. Choleraesuis usually causes necrotizing enterocolitis, apart from septicemia, characterized by hepatitis, pneumonia, and cerebral vasculitis and also causes systemic infections in humans. (Reed et al., 1986; Wilkins and Roberts, 1988; Chang et al., 2013).

Prevention

Management

The efforts made to reduce Salmonellosis incidence differ geographically. In the EU, efforts are focused on the process from farm to processing. On the other hand, in the USA, interventions are applied at the processing level (Rajic et al., 2007; Wilhelm et al., 2012).

Despite of the different focuses to reduce Salmonellosis, the main prevention involves measures to improve good management practices and post-harvest hygiene on farms (Mousing et al., 1997; Alban et al., 2002; Schwarz et al., 2011). These days, the addition of organic acid to feed or water and the administration of probiotics or prebiotics to pigs have emerged as methods to control Salmonella in swine farms. It has been shown that these can decrease the faecal excretion of Salmonella as well (Casey et al., 2007; Creus et al., 2007; De Busser et al., 2009; Martin-Pelaez et al., 2010; Schwarz et al., 2011; Mejicanos et al., 2016).

Another way to reduce Salmonella infection in swine farms is all-in-all-out system. Based on this system, all pigs should enter and leave from the facility together at the same time and this should be applied in mating, farrowing, and nursery units. This system can help to reduce the risk of Salmonella infection since the pigs raised under the same management system are considered to have a similar disease status (Scott et al., 2006; Padungtod et al., 2008).

In addition, it has been proven that fermented feed, Lactobacillus casei-fermented feed, are good for pigs and reduce Salmonella infection. It has also been shown that it was effective in reducing pig diarrhea and intestinal burden of Salmonella as well (Yin et al., 2014). Giving feed fermented liquid to pigs was shown to improve the performance of pigs of all ages (Missotten et al., 2015).

It was suggested that the use of a mixed-bacterial-species competitive-exclusion culture can reduce both load and carriage of Salmonella (Genovese et al., 2003). Reductions in the fecal shedding of Salmonella resulted in diminished horizontal transmission between pen- and littermates (Genovese et al., 2003).

The use of antibiotics is not recommended because of Salmonella’s intracellular persistence and antibiotic resistance. For this reason, vaccination may represent an attractive alternative for the reduction of Salmonella incidence in swine (Gradassi et al., 2013).

Vaccines

Even though, strict hygiene practices and rational husbandry resistance management are the best way to reduce the prevalence of Salmonella, this approach cannot be applied in countries where high prevalence of Salmonella infection is observed. In this case, vaccination is considered a major control measure to reduce Salmonella contamination at the early stages of meat production (Selke et al., 2007; Eddicks et al., 2009; Leyman et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2012; Pesciaroli et al., 2013).

Killed Salmonella vaccines have been used in pigs with variable results. This discrepancy between efficacy results of Killed Salmonella vaccines may be due to their poor ability to induce cell-mediated immunity in vaccinated pigs (Xu et al., 1993; Yamane et al., 2000; Davies and Breslin, 2003; Schwarz et al., 2011). On the other hand, attenuated live vaccine strains have been shown to offer better protection than Killed Salmonella vaccines (Haesebrouck et al., 2004). Live vaccine strains consist of strains that are attenuated, strains with a mutation in genes that are important for bacterial metabolism, or strains in which specific virulence genes are removed (Kramer et al., 1992; Lumsden and Wilkie, 1992; Mastroeni et al., 2001; Boyen et al., 2009; Schwarz et al., 2011).

Vaccination is one of the suggested methods to reduce the burden of S. Typhimurium on swine farms (Haesebrouck et al., 2004; Eddicks et al., 2009; Hotes et al., 2011; Pesciaroli et al., 2013) and it is one possible supplementary measure to reduce Salmonella infection. Nowadays, various vaccine studies have been conducted in pigs with various results (Roesler et al., 2004; Farzan and Friendship, 2010; Hotes et al., 2011; De Ridder et al., 2013a; De Ridder et al., 2013b). For example, SC54 vaccine, a S. Choleraesuis var. kunzendorf avirulent live strain, is effective to protect pigs against infection by virulent S. Choleraesuis and virulent S. Typhimurium (Kramer et al., 1992; Letellier et al., 2000).

Conclusion

Salmonella is a major concern to the swine industry because it leads to clinical illnesses in swine resulting in poor growth performance and profitability (Callaway et al., 2006). As such, S. Typhimurium infection in growing pigs causes growth retardation (Balaji et al., 2000; Turner et al., 2002a; Turner et al., 2002b). In the acute phase of the Salmonella infection, swines show a reduction of growth rate and develop a fever leading to lower profitability (Jenkins et al., 2004).

S. Typhimurium and S. Choleraesuis are typical pig-adapted serotypes. Infection by Salmonella results in economic losses in swine industries by causing serious clinical syndromes in weaned pigs. Salmonella infection in weaned pigs causes fever and continuous diarrhea. It is often the cause of increased mortality, decreased growth rate, and reduced feed efficiency. There are several measures, such as vaccination to prevent salmonellosis, that are implemented differently from country to country. For the treatment of Salmonella, ongoing antibiotic treatment is needed. However, constant doses of antibiotics can be a problem because of antibiotic resistance. Therefore, more focus should be made on prevention than treatment.

Acknowledgements

Rural Development Administration (under grant number PJ0122792016), Republic of Korea, and the research fund of Dankook University (BK21 Plus) in 2014 provided funding to Hyeun Bum Kim.

References

1 Alban L, Stege H, Dahl J. 2002. The new classification system for slaughter-pig herds in the Danish Salmonella surveillance-and-control program. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 53:133-146. 

2 Andino A, Hanning I. 2015. Salmonella enterica: survival, colonization, and virulence differences among serovars. Scientific World Journal 2015:520179. 

3 Aiello SE, Moses MA.2016. The Merck Veterinary Manual 11thEdition. Merck and Co, Kenilworth, NJ. 

4 Arce C, Lucena C, Moreno A, Garrido JJ. 2014. Proteomic analysis of intestinal mucosa responses to Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium in naturally infected pig. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 37:59-67. 

5 Balaji R, Wright KJ, Hill CM, Dritz SS, Knoppel EL, Minton JE. 2000. Acute phase responses of pigs challenged orally with Salmonella typhimurium. Journal of Animal Science 78:1885-1891. 

6 Barrell RA. 1987. Isolations of salmonellas from humans and foods in the Manchester area: 1981-1985. Epidemiology and Infection 98:277-284. 

7 Berends BR, Urlings HA, Snijders JM, Van Knapen F. 1996. Identification and quantification of risk factors in animal management and transport regarding Salmonella spp. in pigs. International Journal of Food Microbiology 30:37-53. 

8 Boyen F, Haesebrouck F, Maes D, Van Immerseel F, Ducatelle R, Pasmans F. 2008. Non-typhoidal Salmonella infections in pigs: a closer look at epidemiology, pathogenesis and control. Veterinary Microbiology 130:1-19. 

9 Boyen F, Pasmans F, Van Immerseel F, Donne E, Morgan E, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F. 2009. Porcine in vitro and in vivo models to assess the virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium for pigs. Laboratory Animals 43:46-52. 

10 Briggs CE, Fratamico PM. 1999. Molecular characterization of an antibiotic resistance gene cluster of Salmonella typhimurium DT104. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 43:846-849. 

11 Busse M. 1995. Media for Salmonella. International Journal of Food Microbiology 26:117-131. 

12 Callaway TR, Morrow JL, Edrington TS, Genovese KJ, Dowd S, Carroll J, Dailey JW, Harvey RB, Poole TL, Anderson RC, Nisbet DJ. 2006. Social stress increases fecal shedding of Salmonella typhimurium by early weaned piglets. Current Issues in Intestinal Microbiology 7:65-71. 

13 Casey PG, Gardiner GE, Casey G, Bradshaw B, Lawlor PG, Lynch PB, Leonard FC, Stanton C, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF, Hill C. 2007. A five-strain probiotic combination reduces pathogen shedding and alleviates disease signs in pigs challenged with Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73:1858-1863. 

14 Chang CH, Chen YS, Chiou MT, Su CH, Chen DS, Tsai CE, Yu B, Hsu YM. 2013. Application of scutellariae radix, gardeniae fructus, and probiotics to prevent Salmonella enterica serovar choleraesuis infection in swine. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2013:568528. 

15 Chen YH, Chen TP, Tsai JJ, Hwang KP, Lu PL, Cheng HH, Peng CF. 1999. Epidemiological study of human salmonellosis during 1991-1996 in southern Taiwan. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences 15:127-136. 

16 Chiu CH, Su LH, Chu C. 2004. Salmonella enterica serotype Choleraesuis: epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical disease, and treatment. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 17:311-322. 

17 Chiu CH, Tang P, Chu C, Hu S, Bao Q, Yu J, Chou YY, Wang HS, Lee YS. 2005. The genome sequence of Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis, a highly invasive and resistant zoonotic pathogen. Nucleic Acids Research 33:1690-1698. 

18 Clothier KA, Kinyon JM, Frana TS. 2010. Comparison of Salmonella serovar isolation and antimicrobial resistance patterns from porcine samples between 2003 and 2008. Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation 22:578-582. 

19 Creus E, Perez JF, Peralta B, Baucells F, Mateu E. 2007. Effect of acidified feed on the prevalence of Salmonella in market-age pigs. Zoonoses and Public Health 54:314-319. 

20 Davies R, Breslin M. 2003. Effects of vaccination and other preventive methods for Salmonella enteritidis on commercial laying chicken farms. The Veterinary Record 153:673-677. 

21 De Busser EV, Dewulf J, Nollet N, Houf K, Schwarzer K, De Sadeleer L, De Zutter L, Maes D. 2009. Effect of organic acids in drinking water during the last 2 weeks prior to slaughter on Salmonella shedding by slaughter pigs and contamination of carcasses. Zoonoses and Public Health 56:129-136. 

22 De Ridder L, Maes D, Dewulf J, Pasmans F, Boyen F, Haesebrouck F, Meroc E, Butaye P, Van der Stede Y. 2013a. Evaluation of three intervention strategies to reduce the transmission of Salmonella Typhimurium in pigs. Veterinary Journal 197:613-618. 

23 De Ridder L, Maes D, Dewulf J, Pasmans F, Boyen F, Haesebrouck F, Meroc E, Roels S, Leyman B, Butaye P, Van der Stede Y. 2013b. Effect of a DIVA vaccine with and without in-feed use of coated calcium-butyrate on transmission of Salmonella Typhimurium in pigs. BioMed Central Veterinary Research 9:243-6148-9-243. 

24 Dibner JJ, Richards JD. 2005. Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: history and mode of action. Poultry Science 84:634-643. 

25 Duffy EA, Belk KE, Sofos JN. 2000. United States Retail Pork Microbiological Baseline. In:Proceedings. Pork Quality and Safety Summit. pp. 305-309. National Pork Producers Council.  

26 Eddicks M, Palzer A, Hormansdorfer S, Ritzmann M, Heinritzi K. 2009. Examination of the compatibility of a Salmonella Typhimurium-live vaccine Salmoporc for three day old suckling piglets. DTW. Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 116:249-254. 

27 Farzan A, Friendship RM. 2010. A clinical field trial to evaluate the efficacy of vaccination in controlling Salmonella infection and the association of Salmonella-shedding and weight gain in pigs. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 74:258-263. 

28 Foley SL, Lynne AM, Nayak R. 2008. Salmonella challenges: prevalence in swine and poultry and potential pathogenicity of such isolates. Journal of Animal Science 86:E149-62. 

29 Garcia-Feliz C, Collazos JA, Carvajal A, Vidal AB, Aladuena A, Ramiro R, de la Fuente M, Echeita MA, Rubio P. 2007. Salmonella enterica infections in Spanish swine fattening units. Zoonoses and Public Health 54:294-300. 

30 Genovese KJ, Anderson RC, Harvey RB, Callaway TR, Poole TL, Edrington TS, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Nisbet DJ. 2003. Competitive exclusion of Salmonella from the gut of neonatal and weaned pigs. Journal of Food Protection 66:1353-1359. 

31 Gradassi M, Pesciaroli M, Martinelli N, Ruggeri J, Petrucci P, Hassan WH, Raffatellu M, Scaglione FE, Ammendola S, Battistoni A, Alborali GL, Pasquali P. 2013. Attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium lacking the ZnuABC transporter: an efficacious orally-administered mucosal vaccine against salmonellosis in pigs. Vaccine 31:3695-3701. 

32 Gray JT, Stabel TJ, Fedorka-Cray PJ. 1996. Effect of dose on the immune response and persistence of Salmonella choleraesuis infection in swine. American Journal of Veterinary Research 57:313-319. 

33 Haesebrouck F, Pasmans F, Chiers K, Maes D, Ducatelle R, Decostere A. 2004. Efficacy of vaccines against bacterial diseases in swine: what can we expect? Veterinary Microbiology 100:255-268. 

34 Hohmann EL. 2001. Nontyphoidal salmonellosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 32:263-269. 

35 Hotes S, Traulsen I, Krieter J. 2011. Salmonella control measures with special focus on vaccination and logistic slaughter procedures. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 58:434-444. 

36 Huang TM, Lin TL, Wu CC. 2009. Serovar distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of swine Salmonella isolates from clinically ill pigs in diagnostic submissions from Indiana in the United States. Letters in Applied Microbiology 48:331-336. 

37 Jenkins NL, Turner JL, Dritz SS, Durham SK, Minton JE. 2004. Changes in circulating insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin-like growth factor binding proteins, and leptin in weaned pigs infected with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 26:49-60. 

38 Korsak N, Degeye JN, Etienne G, China B, Daube G. 2004. Comparison of four different methods for Salmonella detection in fecal samples of porcine origin. Journal of Food Protection 67:2158-2164. 

39 Kramer TT, Roof MB, Matheson RR. 1992. Safety and efficacy of an attenuated strain of Salmonella choleraesuis for vaccination of swine. American Journal of Veterinary Research 53:444-448. 

40 Ku YW, McDonough SP, Palaniappan RU, Chang CF, Chang YF. 2005. Novel attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis strains as live vaccine candidates generated by signature-tagged mutagenesis. Infection and Immunity 73:8194-8203. 

41 Kumar T, Rajora VR, Arora N. 2014. Prevalence of Salmonella in pigs and broilers in the Tarai region of Uttarakhand, India. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 32:99-101. 

42 Letellier A, Messier S, Lessard L, Quessy S. 2000. Assessment of various treatments to reduce carriage of Salmonella in swine. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 64:27-31. 

43 Leyman B, Boyen F, Van Parys A, Verbrugghe E, Haesebrouck F, Pasmans F. 2011. Salmonella Typhimurium LPS mutations for use in vaccines allowing differentiation of infected and vaccinated pigs. Vaccine 29:3679-3685. 

44 Lichtensteiger CA, Vimr ER. 2003. Systemic and enteric colonization of pigs by a hilA signature-tagged mutant of Salmonella choleraesuis. Microbial Pathogenesis 34:149-154. 

45 Lumsden JS, Wilkie BN. 1992. Immune response of pigs to parenteral vaccination with an aromatic-dependent mutant of Salmonella typhimurium. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 56:296-302. 

46 Martin-Pelaez S, Costabile A, Hoyles L, Rastall RA, Gibson GR, La Ragione RM, Woodward MJ, Mateu E, Martin-Orue SM. 2010. Evaluation of the inclusion of a mixture of organic acids or lactulose into the feed of pigs experimentally challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium. Veterinary Microbiology 142:337-345. 

47 Mastroeni P, Chabalgoity JA, Dunstan SJ, Maskell DJ, Dougan G. 2001. Salmonella: immune responses and vaccines. Veterinary Journal 161:132-164. 

48 Mejicanos G, Sanjayan N, Kim IH, Nyachoti CM. 2016. Recent advances in canola meal utilization in swine nutrition. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 58:7-016-0085-5. eCollection 2016. 

49 Meurens F, Berri M, Auray G, Melo S, Levast B, Virlogeux-Payant I, Chevaleyre C, Gerdts V, Salmon H. 2009. Early immune response following Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Typhimurium infection in porcine jejunal gut loops. Veterinary Research 40:5. 

50 Missotten JA, Michiels J, Degroote J, De Smet S. 2015. Fermented liquid feed for pigs: an ancient technique for the future. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 6:4-1891-6-4. eCollection 2015. 

51 Mousing J, Jensen PT, Halgaard C, Bager F, Feld N, Nielsen B, Nielsen JP, Bech-Nielsen S. 1997. Nation-wide Salmonella enterica surveillance and control in Danish slaughter swine herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 29:247-261. 

52 Murray PR, Baron EJ, Tenover MA, Yolken RH. 1999. Manual of clinical microbiology. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. 

53 Nishio M, Okada N, Miki T, Haneda T, Danbara H. 2005. Identification of the outer-membrane protein PagC required for the serum resistance phenotype in Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis. Microbiology 151:863-873. 

54 Nollet N, Maes D, Duchateau L, Hautekiet V, Houf K, Van Hoof J, De Zuttera L, De Kruif A, Geers R. 2005. Discrepancies between the isolation of Salmonella from mesenteric lymph nodes and the results of serological screening in slaughter pigs. Veterinary Research 36:545-555. 

55 Nye KJ, Fallon D, Frodsham D, Gee B, Graham C, Howe S, Messer S, Turner T, Warren RE. 2002. An evaluation of the performance of XLD, DCA, MLCB, and ABC agars as direct plating media for the isolation of Salmonella enterica from faeces. Journal of Clinical Pathology 55:286-288. 

56 Oliveira CJ, Garcia TB, Carvalho LF, Givisiez PE. 2007. Nose-to-nose transmission of Salmonella Typhimurium between weaned pigs. Veterinary Microbiology 125:355-361. 

57 Onyango DM, Ndeda VM, Wandili SA, Wawire SA, Ochieng P. 2014. Antimicrobial profile of Salmonella enterica serotype Choleraesuis from free-range swine in Kakamega fish market, western Kenya. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries 8:1381-1390. 

58 Padungtod P, Kadohira M, Hill G. 2008. Livestock production and foodborne diseases from food animals in Thailand. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 70:873-879. 

59 Pedersen K, Sorensen G, Lofstrom C, Leekitcharoenphon P, Nielsen B, Wingstrand A, Aarestrup FM, Hendriksen RS, Baggesen DL. 2015. Reappearance of Salmonella serovar Choleraesuis var. Kunzendorf in Danish pig herds. Veterinary Microbiology 176:282-291. 

60 Pesciaroli M, Gradassi M, Martinelli N, Ruggeri J, Pistoia C, Raffatellu M, Magistrali CF, Battistoni A, Pasquali P, Alborali GL. 2013. Salmonella Typhimurium lacking the Znuabc transporter is attenuated and immunogenic in pigs. Vaccine 31:2868-2873. 

61 Rajic A, Waddell LA, Sargeant JM, Read S, Farber J, Firth MJ, Chambers A. 2007. An overview of microbial food safety programs in beef, pork, and poultry from farm to processing in Canadian Journal of Food Protection 70:1286-1294. 

62 Reed WM, Olander HJ, Thacker HL. 1986. Studies on the pathogenesis of Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella choleraesuis var kunzendorf infection in weanling pigs. Veterinary ResearchAmerican Journal of Veterinary Research 47:75-83. 

63 Roesler U, Marg H, Schroder I, Mauer S, Arnold T, Lehmann J, Truyen U, Hensel A. 2004. Oral vaccination of pigs with an invasive gyrA-cpxA-rpoB Salmonella Typhimurium mutant. Vaccine 23:595-603. 

64 Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson MA, Roy SL, Jones JL, Griffin PM, 2011. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States-major pathogens. Emerging Infectious Diseases 17:7-15. 

65 Schierack P, Nordhoff M, Pollmann M, Weyrauch KD, Amasheh S, Lodemann U, Jores J, Tachu B, Kleta S, Blikslager A, Tedin K, Wieler LH. 2006. Characterization of a porcine intestinal epithelial cell line for in vitro studies of microbial pathogenesis in swine. Histochemistry and Cell Biology 125:293-305. 

66 Schwarz P, Kich JD, Kolb J, Cardoso M. 2011. Use of an avirulent live Salmonella Choleraesuis vaccine to reduce the prevalence of Salmonella carrier pigs at slaughter. The Veterinary Record 169:553. 

67 Scott A, Zepeda C, Garber L, Smith J, Swayne D, Rhorer A, Kellar J, Shimshony A, Batho H, Caporale V, Giovannini A. 2006. The concept of compartmentalisation. Revue Scientifique et Technique 25:873-9, 881-7, 889-95. 

68 Selke M, Meens J, Springer S, Frank R, Gerlach GF. 2007. Immunization of pigs to prevent disease in humans: construction and protective efficacy of a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium live negative-marker vaccine. Infection and Immunity 75:2476-2483. 

69 Tadee P, Kumpapong K, Sinthuya D, Yamsakul P, Chokesajjawatee N, Nuanualsuwan S, Pornsukarom S, Molla BZ, Gebreyes WA, Patchanee P. 2014. Distribution, quantitative load and characterization of Salmonella associated with swine farms in upper-northern Thailand. Journal of Veterinary Science 15:327-334. 

70 Tamang MD, Gurung M, Nam HM, Moon DC, Kim SR, Jang GC, Jung DY, Jung SC, Park YH, Lim SK. 2015. Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in pigs from conventional and organic farms and first report of S. serovar 1,4,[5],12:i:- from Korea. Veterinary Microbiology 178:119-124. 

71 Tanaka T, Imai Y, Kumagae N, Sato S. 2010. The effect of feeding lactic acid to Salmonella typhimurium experimentally infected swine. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 72:827-831. 

72 Timoney JF, Gillespie JH, Scott FW, Barlough JE. 1988. Hagan and Bruner's microbiology and infectious diseases of domestic animals. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York. 

73 Turner JL, Dritz SS, Higgins JJ, Minton JE. 2002a. Effects of Ascophyllum nodosum extract on growth performance and immune function of young pigs challenged with Salmonella typhimurium. Journal of Animal Science 80:1947-1953. 

74 Turner JL, Dritz SS, Higgins JJ, Herkelman KL, Minton JE. 2002b. Effects of a Quillaja saponaria extract on growth performance and immune function of weanling pigs challenged with Salmonella typhimurium. Journal of Animal Science 80:1939-1946. 

75 Verbrugghe E, Boyen F, Van Parys A, Van Deun K, Croubels S, Thompson A, Shearer N, Leyman B, Haesebrouck F, Pasmans F. 2011. Stress induced Salmonella Typhimurium recrudescence in pigs coincides with cortisol induced increased intracellular proliferation in macrophages. Veterinary Research 42:118-9716-42-118. 

76 Vigo GB, Cappuccio JA, Pineyro PE, Salve A, Machuca MA, Quiroga MA, Moredo F, Giacoboni G, Cancer JL, Caffer IG, Binsztein N, Pichel M, Perfumo CJ. 2009. Salmonella enterica subclinical infection: bacteriological, serological, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and antimicrobial resistance profiles--longitudinal study in a three-site farrow-to-finish farm. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 6:965-972. 

77 Visscher CF, Klein G, Verspohl J, Beyerbach M, Stratmann-Selke J, Kamphues J. 2011. Serodiversity and serological as well as cultural distribution of Salmonella on farms and in abattoirs in Lower Saxony, Germany. International Journal of Food Microbiology 146:44-51. 

78 Wales A, Weaver J, McLaren IM, Smith RP, Mueller-Doblies D, Davies RH. 2013. Investigation of the distribution of Salmonella within an integrated pig breeding and production organisation in the United Kingdom. ISRN Veterinary Science 2013:943126. 

79 Wang J, Hu G, Lin Z, He L, Xu L, Zhang Y. 2014. Characteristic and functional analysis of a newly established porcine small intestinal epithelial cell line. PLoS One 9:e110916. 

80 Wilhelm B, Rajic A, Parker S, Waddell L, Sanchez J, Fazil A, Wilkins W, McEwen SA. 2012. Assessment of the efficacy and quality of evidence for five on-farm interventions for Salmonella reduction in grow-finish swine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 107:1-20. 

81 Wilkins EG, Roberts C. 1988. Extraintestinal salmonellosis. Epidemiology and Infection 100:361-368. 

82 Xu HR, Hsu HS, Moncure CW, King RA. 1993. Correlation of antibody titres induced by vaccination with protection in mouse typhoid. Vaccine 11:725-729. 

83 Xu XG, Zhao HN, Zhang Q, Ding L, Li ZC, Li W, Wu HY, Chuang KP, Tong DW, Liu HJ. 2012. Oral vaccination with attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium expressing Cap protein of PCV2 and its immunogenicity in mouse and swine models. Veterinary Microbiology 157:294-303. 

84 Yamane Y, Leonard JD, Kobatake R, Awamura N, Toyota Y, Ohta H, Otsuki K, Inoue T. 2000. A case study on Salmonella enteritidis (SE) origin at three egg-laying farms and its control with an S. enteritidis bacterin. Avian Diseases 44:519-526. 

85 Yin F, Farzan A, Wang QC, Yu H, Yin Y, Hou Y, Friendship R, Gong J. 2014. Reduction of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium DT104 infection in experimentally challenged weaned pigs fed a lactobacillus-fermented feed. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 11:628-634. 

86 Zhao S, McDermott PF, Friedman S, Abbott J, Ayers S, Glenn A, Hall-Robinson E, Hubert SK, Harbottle H, Walker RD, Chiller TM, White DG. 2006a. Antimicrobial resistance and genetic relatedness among Salmonella from retail foods of animal origin: NARMS retail meat surveillance. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 3:106-117. 

87 Zhao SH, Kuhar D, Lunney JK, Dawson H, Guidry C, Uthe JJ, Bearson SM, Recknor J, Nettleton D, Tuggle CK. 2006b. Gene expression profiling in Salmonella Choleraesuis-infected porcine lung using a long oligonucleotide microarray. Mammalian Genome : Official Journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society 17:777-789.