Effects of dietary enzyme cocktail on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs

Yunkang Kim1Jangryeol Baek1Kibeom Jang1Junsu Kim1Sheena Kim1Daye Mun1Byeonghyeon Kim1Younghwa Kim1Juncheol Park1Jeehwan Choe1*Minho Song1*

Abstract

Soybean, one of most widely used swine feed component in the world, contains non-starch polysaccharides (NSP). The digestive system of weaned pigs is not yet fully developed, and thus weaned pigs cannot easily digest diets based on corn and soybean meal. Dietary exogenous enzymes supplementation has been intensively investigated to assist digestion of anti-nutritional factors, such as NSP. This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary enzyme cocktail on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs. A total 36 weaned pigs (5.92 ± 0.48 kg BW; 28 d old) were randomly allotted to 2 dietary treatments (3 pigs/pen, 6 replicates/treatment) in a randomized complete block design. The dietary treatments were a typical diet based on corn and soybean meal (CON) and CON with 0.05% enzyme cocktail (Cocktail; mixture of xylanase, α-amylase, protease, β-glucanase, and pectinase). Pigs were fed their respective diets for 6 wk. Growth performance, morphology of ileum, apparent ileal digestibility (AID) and apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of dry matter, crude protein, and energy of weaned pigs were measured. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed for growth performance for the duration of the experimental period, and morphology of ileum, and nutrient digestibility between CON and Cocktail treatment groups. Therefore, the results from the current study indicated that enzyme cocktail supplementation in diets had no influence on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs.

Keyword



Introduction

Soybean meal has been widely used as a protein source for monogastric animal in the world (FAO, 2004). Soybean contains not only abundant amounts of proteins but also plenty of

carbohydrates that are mainly composed of non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) and oligosaccharides (Choct, 1997). Soybeans consist of approximately 20% NSP, in which soluble and insoluble represent at about 3 and 17%, respectively (Choct, 1997).

Weaning is a stressful event for nursery pigs and is accompanied by tremendous changes in gastrointestinal physiology, microbiology, and immunology (Hampson, 1986; Pluske et al., 1997; Brooks et al., 2001). Moreover, the digestive system of weaned pig is not fully developed, and the secretion of digestive enzymes is limited to the digestion of dietary nutrients (Song et al., 2015; Park et al., 2016). Thus, weaned pigs have difficulty digesting diets based on corn and soybean meal with high amount of NSP by their endogenous enzymes. It is well known that unhydrolyzed NSP has negative effects on nutrient absorption (Song et al., 2015; Park et al., 2016). Supplementation of exogenous enzymes can be a solution to this problem. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of supplementation with dietary enzyme cocktail containing carbohydrases and proteases on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs.

Materials and Methods

The Chungnam National University Institutional Animal Care and Use approved all experimental protocols used in this study (approval code: CNU-00611).

Experimental design, animals, and diets

A total of 36 weaned pigs [Duroc × (Landrace × Yorkshire); 5.92 ± 0.48 kg of average body weight (BW); 28 d old] were used in this experiment. Pigs were moved to nursery pens equipped with a feeder and waterer in an environmentally controlled room and randomly assigned to 2 dietary treatments (3 pigs/pen, 6 replicated pens/ treatment) in a randomized complete block design. The dietary treatments were a normal corn and soybean meal based diet (CON) and CON with 0.05% enzyme cocktail [Cocktail; mixture of xylanase (4,000,000 U/kg), α-amylase (1,000,000 U/kg), protease (500,000 U/kg), β-glucanase (150,000 U/kg), and pectinase (25,000 U/kg)], which were commercially purchased. Pigs were fed for 6 wk using a 2-phase feeding program with declining diet complexity and each phase was lasted 3 wk. The diets did not include spray-dried plasma, antibiotics, or zinc oxide to avoid their antibacterial or physiological effects (Table 1). Pigs were allowed free access to diets and water at all times. For measurements of intestinal morphology, apparent total digestibility, and apparent ileal digestibility, 12 pigs were randomly selected (2 pigs from each pen).

Table 1. Composition of experimental diets for weaned pigs (as-fed basis).

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/images/N0030440406_image/Table_KJAOS_44_04_06_T1.jpg

Table 1. Composition of experimental diets for weaned pigs (as-fed basis) (Continued).

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/images/N0030440406_image/Table_KJAOS_44_04_06_T1_1.jpg

wPhase 1 = wk 1 to 3 (21 days).

xPhase 2 = wk 4 to 6 (21 days).

yProvided per kilogram of diet: vitamin A, 12,000 IU; vitamin D3, 2,500 IU; vitamin E, 30 IU; vitamin K3, 3 mg; D-pantothenic acid, 15 mg; nicotinic acid, 40 mg; choline, 400 mg; vitamin B12, 12 µg.

zProvided per kilogram of diet: Fe, 90 mg from iron sulfate; Cu, 8.8 mg from copper sulfate; Zn, 100 mg from zinc oxide; Mn, 54 mg from manganese oxide; I, 0.35 mg from potassium iodide; Se, 0.30 mg from sodium selenite.

Sample collection and analyses

Growth performance

The pigs were individually weighed at the start, on d 21, and 42 of the experiment and the average body weight gain was calculated. Amounts of feed supplied per pen were recorded for each phase and the rest of feed was weighed at the end of each phase. 

Intestinal morphology

After the 6 wk experimental period, the 12 pigs selected as previously mentioned were euthanized using CO2 after injection of zoletil. Tissue samples from the small intestine were directly collected. Segments of ileum, about 5 cm in length, were taken and flushed with distilled water to take out any excess blood and digesta. Then, the tissues were immersed in a 6% formaldehyde phosphate buffer and kept at 4℃. The fixed intestinal tissues were embedded in paraffin, sectioned at a 5 µm thickness, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The slides were imaged using a digital slide scanner (NanoZoomer Digital Pathology System; Hamamatsu Co., Bridgewater, NJ). All measurements were conducted in the associated slide-viewing software (NDP. view; Hamamatsu Co.). The intestinal morphological measurements included villus height, crypt depth, villus area, and goblet cell number.

Apparent total tract digestibility

For the measurement of apparent total tract digestibility, chrome oxide, a indigestible marker, was added at 0.25% of the respective dietary treatments. The 12 pigs selected as previously mentioned were fed each dietary treatment with 0.25% chromic oxide between d 36 and 42 after weaning. Fecal samples were collected for 3 days post the 4-d adjustment period. Fecal samples were immediately stored at -20℃. Fecal samples were dried in a forced-air drying oven at 60℃ and ground through a cyclone mill (Foss Tecator Sycltec 1093, HillerØd, Denmark) before analysis. Fecal samples were analyzed for dry matter (method 930.15; AOAC, 2000), nitrogen (method 988.05; AOAC, 2000), and gross energy using a bomb calorimeter (Parr 1281 Bomb Calorimeter, Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL, USA).

Apparent ileal digestibility

After the 6 wk experimental period, the 12 pigs selected as previously mentioned were euthanized using CO2 after injection of zoletil. Tissue samples from the small intestine were directly collected. Digesta samples were immediately stored at -20℃. Digesta samples were dried in a forced-air drying oven at 60℃ and ground through a cyclone mill (Foss Tecator Sycltec 1093, HillerØd, Denmark) before analysis. Digesta samples were analyzed for dry matter (method 930.15; AOAC, 2000), nitrogen (method 988.05; AOAC, 2000), and gross energy using a bomb calorimeter (Parr 1281 Bomb Calorimeter, Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL, USA).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the GLM procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) in a randomized complete block design. The pen was used as the experimental unit for the growth performance, intestinal morphology, and nutrient digestibility. The variability of the data was shown as the standard error and a probability level of p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results and Discussion

No statistical differences were observed for growth performance during the experimental period between dietary treatments (Table 2). There were no significant differences on villus height, crypt depth, and ratio of villus height to crypt depth in ileum between CON and Cocktail groups (Table 3). No statistical differences (Fig. 1 and 2) were also observed for digestibility of DM, CP, and energy between treatments.

Table 2. Growth performance of weaned pigs fed dietary treatments.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/images/N0030440406_image/Table_KJAOS_44_04_06_T2.jpg

xCON = control diet based on corn and soybean meal.

yCocktail = CON with 0.05% enzyme cocktail (mixture of xylanase, α-amylase, protease, β-glucanase, and pectinase).

zSEM = standard error of mean.

Abbreviations: ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; G:F, gain to feed ratio.

Table 3. Morphology of ileum of weaning pigs fed dietary treatments.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/images/N0030440406_image/Table_KJAOS_44_04_06_T3.jpg

xCON = control diet based on corn and soybean meal.

yCocktail = CON with 0.05% enzyme cocktail (mixture of xylanase, α-amylase, protease, β-glucanase, and pectinase).

zSEM = standard error of mean.

Fig. 1.

Apparent total tract digestibility of weaned pigs fed dietary treatments. Values are means ± SEM. CON = control diet included corn and soybean meal, Cocktail = CON with 0.05% enzyme cocktail (mixture of xylanase, α-amylase, protease, β-glucanase, and pectinase). No statistical differences were observed between CON and Cocktail.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/images/N0030440406_image/Figure_KJAOS_44_04_06_F1.jpg
Fig. 2.

Apparent ileal digestibility of weaned pigs fed dietary treatments. Values are means ± SEM. CON = control diet included corn and soybean meal, Cocktail = CON with 0.05% enzyme cocktail (mixture of xylanase, α-amylase, protease, β-glucanase, and pectinase). No statistical differences were observed between CON and Cocktail.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/images/N0030440406_image/Figure_KJAOS_44_04_06_F2.jpg

Results showed that enzyme cocktail supplementation had no effects on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and nutrient digestibility. Previous studies also failed to observe positive effects of carbohydrase on growth performance and nutrient digestibility (Officer, 1995; Barrera et al., 2004; Olukosi et al., 2007). This experiment used an enzyme cocktail which was composed of xylanase, α-amylase, protease, β-glucanase, and pectinase. Xylanase was the main enzyme of the cocktail used in this research (xylanase: 4,000 units/g, α-amylase: 1,000 units/g, protease: 500 units/g, β-glucanase: 150 units/g, pectinase: 25 units/g). However, arabinoxylan in corn and soybean meal based diets was approximately 2.4% in the current research. Thus, enzyme cocktail could not digest corn and soybean meal based diets effectively.

Consequently, based on the results of the current study, weaned pigs fed diets supplemented with an enzyme cocktail did not show significant changes in growth performance, intestinal morphology, nutrient digestibility compared with those fed CON diets.

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ012294)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

References

1 AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia, USA. 

2 Barrera M, Cervantes M, Sauer WC, Areiza AB, Torrentera N, Cervantes M. 2004. Iieal amino acid digestibility and performance of growing pigs fed wheat-based diets supplemented with xylanase. Journal of Animal Science 82:1997-2003. 

3 Brooks PH, Moran CA, Beal JD, Demeckova V, Campbell A. 2001. Liquid feeding for the young piglets. In The Weaner Pig: Nutrition and Management edited by Varley MA, Wiseman JR. pp. 153-178. CAB International, Wallinford, Oxon.  

4 Choct M. 1997. Feed non-starch polysaccharides: Chemical structures and nutritional significance. Feed Milling international 191:13-36. 

5 FAO. 2004. Protein sources for the animal feed industry. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. 

6 Hampson DJ. 1986. Alterations in piglet small intestinal structure at weaning. Research in Veterinary Science 40:32-40. 

7 Officer DI. 1995. Effect of multienzyme supplements on the growth performance of piglets during the pre- and post-weaning periods. Animal Feed Science and Technology 56:55-65. 

8 Olukosi OA, Sands JS, Adeola O. 2007. Supplementation of carbohydrases or phytase individually or in combination to diets for weanling and growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 85:1702-1711. 

9 Park SW, Kim BH, Kim YH, Kim S, Jang KB, Kim YH, Park JC, Song MH, Oh SN. 2016. Nutrition and feed approach according to pig physiology. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 43:750-760. [in Korean] 

10 Pluske JR, Hampson DJ, Williams IH. 1997. Factors influencing the structure and function of the small intestine in the weaned pig: A review. Livestock Production Science 51:215-236. 

11 Song MH, Kim S, Kim YH Park JC, Kim YH. 2015. Value of spray-dried egg in pig nursery diets. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 42:207-213.