The effect of soil heterogeneity and container length on the growth of Populus euramericana in a greenhouse study

PLANT & FOREST
Afroja Rahman1 Loth Meng1 Si Ho Han1 Gi Chun Seo2 Mun Ho Jung3 Byung Bae Park*1*

Abstract

Soil characteristics along with various container lengths have an important role in the early survival rate and growth of seedlings by influencing the seedling quality. This experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of container length and different soil mixtures on the growth of poplar in a greenhouse. Two types of soil, homogeneous vs. heterogeneous, were used along with two container lengths (30 vs. 60 cm). The heterogeneous soil was made by dividing 50% vermiculite from a mixture of 25% vermicompost and 25% nursery soil in volume. For the homogeneous soil, the above three soil types were mixed together. Populus euramericana clone cuttings were planted in late April, and then, the growth height, root collar diameter (RCD) and biomass were measured in August. The height of the poplar was not significantly affected by container length and soil type, but the RCD was significantly affected by soil type. Leaf and root biomass was higher at the long container than at the short container for both soil treatments, but stem biomass was lower at the heterogeneous soil than at the homogeneous soil treatment. Root to shoot biomass ratio was higher at the heterogeneous soil treatment than at the homogeneous soil treatment by 12%. In conclusion, heterogeneous soil along with a long container is suitable to increase the carbon allocation into the root.

Keyword



Introduction

Forest restoration is a long term challenging process that needs effective planning, quality seedling and monitoring. Seedling quality plays an important role as it determine the initial survival of seedling after transplanting in the field. However, seedling quality requirement will vary with depending on the soil, climate and environment of the site. For example, seedlings could be under water stress because of poor contact of roots with soil, and low rooting system that is not able to uptake sufficient water from the soil in water-limited soil environments (Kozlowski and Davis, 1975; Burdett, 1983). To overcome water stress, larger root system with greater water holding capacity is consider as an advantage for the initial survival of seedling especially for dry condition (Hobbs et al., 1982; Sands, 1984). In addition, seedling height and root collar diameter ratio is an important characteristics for seedling quality (Jacobs et al., 2012).

To achieve these characteristics in seedling, the seedling should be grown in suitable container with appropriate soil medium. Soil characteristics along with various container lengths play an important role in the initial growth of seedling which significantly influences on the initial survival rate and growth during restoration and regeneration process. Dominguez-Lerena et al. (2006) reported that the root volume and survival rate of Pinus pinea seedlings increase as the container height and diameter increases in both nursery and field study. They also suggested that the ratio of container depth and diameter should be four to get the best quality seedling. In addition of container shape, optimal growth of root depends on favorable soil or media for water, nutrient, and environment (Leskovar et al., 1990; Kim and Choi, 2016), because plants possess some important mechanisms like root proliferation and changes in nutrient uptakes depending on soil nutrient availability (Drew and Saker, 1978).

Soil heterogeneity is an important factor among plants for competition (Chapin, 1980) but there are very few studies for seedling growth in the forestry even though nutrient heterogeneity is common in natural habitats (Jackson and Caldwell, 1993; Gross et al., 1995; Ryel et al., 1996; Cain et al., 1999). Because nutrients are distributed in patchy manners in the soil, plant roots response to nutrient patches (Hodge, 2004). Plants can enter roots towards the high nutrient concentrated zone (Hutchings and de Kroon, 1994; Robinson, 1994; Robinson and Van Vuuren, 1998), especially fine roots proliferate in localized nutrient patches (Drew and Saker, 1978; Granato and Raper, 1989; Jackson and Caldwell, 1993; Pande et al., 2017). Fransen et al. (2001) reported that the both perennial grasses Festuca rubra and Anthoxanthum odoratum showed increasing root volume in response to localized nutrient enrichment, especially for N.

Container length also has a great influence on seedling growth. In the meta-analysis of 65 studies, the double container size will increase the biomass by 43% in average (Poorter et al., 2012a). Reduction in container size decreases the water and nutrient availability and also suppress the root growth (Jackson et al., 1996). Not only root but also the shoot of plants was affected by container size, Smaller containers decrease the photosynthesis because of lower light availability by higher density of plants (Robbins and Pharr, 1988; Climent et al., 2011), lower nutrient availability (Sinclair and Horie, 1989; NeSmith and Duval, 1998), and increase root mass fraction (Poorter et al., 2012b).

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of soil heterogeneity and container length on the growth of Populus euramericana cuttings in a greenhouse. We hypothesized that the long container length with soil heterogeneity could increase root biomass as well as seedling quality. As root will proliferate to more nutrient rich zone, it will grow deeper in heterogeneous condition. This study will give us knowledge about the effect of soil and container length variation for seedling production in forestry area.

Materials and Method

Study site and species

The experiment was conducted in the greenhouse located in the Chungnam National University Experimental Forest at Daejeon, South Korea (36o22'16" N and 127o21'08"E). The mean air temperature was 23.6℃ and humidity was 70% in the greenhouse from May to August 2016.

We used branches in 1 cm diameter of clone of Populus euramericana for cuttings, which were provided from National Institute of Forest Science in Korea.

Experimental design

This experiment was designed for 2 × 2 factorial experiment with soil type (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous) and container length (30 cm vs. 60 cm) with five replications in a completely randomized block design.

Plastic containers were made by PVC lay-plat hose (15 cm in diameter). For making containers, PVC lay-plat hose was cut into 70 cm for 60 cm container length treatment and 40 cm for 30 cm container length treatment. The bottom of each PVC lay-plat hose was sealed with stapler and holes (5 mm in diameter) were made by punching on both side of the container with two lines with 3 cm interval between holes for ensuring aeration and water drainage.

The homogeneous soil treatment was mixed by 25% soil in the nursery, 50% vermiculite, and 25% vermicompost (VERMIFARM, Republic of Korea) in volume. These mixed soil was filled at both container lengths for homogeneous soil treatment (Fig. 1).

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/files/N0030450201_image/Figure_KJAOS_45_02_01_F1.jpg

Fig. 1. 2X2 factorial experimental design with container length and soil type. 30 cm and 60 cm container length with homogenous soil (left) and heterogeneous soil (right).

Fifty percent vermiculite was separated from the mixed soil with 25% soil and 25% vermicompost for the heterogeneous soil treatment. Vermiculite was filled of half upper part of the both container lengths, whereas the mixed soil was putted on half lower part of the both container lengths (Fig. 1).

One cutting with 12 cm in height and 1 cm in diameter was planted at each container at late April, 2016. We used a rooting accelerator (Luton, Farm Hannong, Republic of Korea) for inducing roots and a plant liniment (Lac Balsam, Frunol Delicia, Germany) for reducing water evaporation from the cut. Wooden rack was used to keep containers vertically.

Water was irrigated for 15 minutes at everyday by hand spray. Pruning was done at early May to keep one branch per cutting.

Chemical Analysis

Three soil samples were collected to analyze the chemical properties of nursery soil. For chemical analyses, 500 g soil samples were randomly collected from the surface soil approximately 5 cm in depth from the nursery. The collected soil samples were stored at 4℃ until analysis. The soil organic matter content was determined using the Tyurin method (Walkley and Black, 1934; Nelson and Sommers, 1996). The soil pH and electrical conductivity were measured using a 1 : 5 (w/v) soil : distilled water suspension. Total nitrogen was measured in 1 g soil by using the micro-Kjeldahl method (Bremner et al., 1996) and available phosphorus (P2O5) was measured with the Lancaster method (Kuo et al., 1996; Cox, 2001). The cation exchange capacity (CEC) was determined in 1N HN4OAc and CH3COOH extracts by using the Brown method (Sumner and Miller, 1996). Exchangeable cations K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, and Na+ in the 1N NH4OAc extract were determined using an atomic absorption spectrometer (AA280FS; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, U.S.A.).

Three 500 g vermicompost and vermiculite were collected at three different bags for chemical analysis. The analysis method was the same with above soil chemical analysis.

Growth Measurements

The height and root collar diameter of cuttings were measured on late August. The height was measured from the branch emerging point to apical meristem and the root collar diameter was measured at the branch emerging point. The cuttings were harvested in September and divided into leaf, stem and root. For root harvesting, the container was cut into upper and lower parts on 15 cm from the bottom for 30 cm container length and 30 cm from the bottom for 60 cm container length. The roots were sieved with 2 mm mesh and then were washed in tap water to remove soil from roots. All components were dried at 65℃ for 48 hours in a dry oven.

Statistical analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan’s multiple comparison tests was applied to test the effects of container length and soil treatment on height, root collar diameter and dry weight. All probabilities were tested at the significant level at 0.05.

Results and Discussion

Soil characteristics

The pH of soil and vermicompost was from 6.5 to 8.5, neutral or somewhat low basic (Table 1). Most of properties Organic matter was 21 - 110 times higher in vermicompost than vermiculite and nursery soil. Available P was higher in vermicompost with the range 14 ­- 33 times than in nursery soil and vermiculite. Total N, exchangeable K and Na, CEC, and EC in soil were higher in vermicompost than vermiculite and nursery soil. To survive in harsh conditions, seedlings with better root system are required so that plants can easily uptake nutrients and water from soil. Plant roots tend to grow towards nutrient rich patches in heterogeneous conditions, but was not in homogeneous soil. Nutrient was placed mostly in lower part in heterogeneous soil where as in homogeneous soil nutrient is equally distributed that will induce root proliferation more deep into the soil (Fransen et al., 2001). As a result, root growth was higher in heterogeneous soil treatment than in homogeneous soil treatment.

Table 1. Soil chemical analysis of each soil type of experiment.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/files/N0030450201_image/Table_KJAOS_45_02_01_T1.jpg

Available P, CEC and EC represent H2PO4-, cation exchange capacity, and electrical conductivity, respectively. Total N is the sum of organic N and inorganic N. Parenthesis is standard error (n = 3)

Growth characteristics

There were no interaction effects as well as main effects of soil type and container length on the growth of height (Table 2, Fig. 2(a)). The growth of root collar diameter was significantly higher at homogeneous soil treatment than at heterogeneous soil treatment (p < 0.01), but there were no differences between container length treatments (Table 2, Fig. 2(b)).

Table 2. ANOVA table for growth parameters.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/files/N0030450201_image/Table_KJAOS_45_02_01_T2.jpg
http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/files/N0030450201_image/Figure_KJAOS_45_02_01_F2.jpg

Fig. 2.(a) Height growth and (b) Root collar diameter growth of Populus euramericana cuttings between each treatments. Vertical bars show standard errors (n = 5).

The total biomass including above- and belowground was similarly 66 g per plant (Fig. 3), but each tissue dry weight showed different trends. Leaf dry weight was significantly higher at 60 cm container length than at 30 cm container length, but there were no differences between homogeneous soil and heterogeneous soil treatments (Table 2, Fig. 3(a)). Stem dry weight was significantly higher at homogeneous soil than at heterogeneous soil by 20%, but there were no differences between container length treatments (Table 2, Fig. 3(b)). Root dry weight was significantly higher at 60 cm container length than at 30 cm container length by 21%, but there were no differences between soil treatments (Table 2, Fig. 3(c)).

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/files/N0030450201_image/Figure_KJAOS_45_02_01_F3.jpg

Fig. 3.(a) Leaf, (b) stem, and (c) root dry weight of Populus euramericana cuttings between each treatments. Vertical bars show standard errors (n = 5).

The average of root to shoot ratio was 21% (Fig. 4(a)). Root to shoot ratio at heterogeneous soil was higher than at homogeneous soil. Generally, 7% more roots were located at above the half of container depth if we assumed root distributed evenly across container depth. More roots were located at above half of container length at 60 cm container length than at 30 cm container length.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/files/N0030450201_image/Figure_KJAOS_45_02_01_F4.jpg

Fig. 4.(a) Root to shoot ratio and (b) upper root to total in root weight of Populus euramericana cuttings between each treatments. Vertical bars show standard errors (n = 5).

Seedling quality is an important factor for successful regeneration. For seedling establishment and survival, physiological stress resistance under harsh environmental conditions at the time of transplanting is an essential characteristics for qualified seedlings (Timmis, 1980; Ritchie, 1984; McCreary and Duryea, 1985; Rietveld, 1989). Because water absorption capacity of seedlings depends on root volume (Carlson, 1986), we hypothesized that the long container and heterogeneous soil might improve the survival and initial growth of seedlings by increasing poor rooting system (Ritchie, 1984; Sands, 1984; Rietveld, 1989). In this study, 60 cm container length showed the higher growth for leaf, stem and root and homogenous soil showed higher stem growth than other treatment (Table 2; Fig. 3). Our findings indicate that the larger the container size the more the tree growth. This is because growth rates of shoots and roots in large size container are independent (Tonutti and Giulivo, 1990).

Conclusion

This research was conducted to investigate the effect of soil heterogeneity and container length on Populus growth. Soil heterogeneity and container length have great influence on seedling growth as well as biomass production. It was found that container length positively affects the growth of seedling like root growth, shoot height and biomass production and also for maintaining the balance between shoot and root growth. Because carbon allocation to root growth was higher in heterogeneous soil treatment than in homogeneous soil treatment, heterogeneous soil in containers could make seedlings more vigorous so that it can survive after transplanting. This study gives us knowledge that if seedlings produced on heterogeneous soil and larger container will have high root and shoot growth that will lead to increase the survival rate for successful restoration in harsh condition.

Acknowledgements

This study was partially carried out with the support of the Research Fund provided by Chungnam National University.

References

1 Bremner JM. 1996. Nitrogen-total. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3-Chemical Methods edited by Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH. pp. 1085-1121. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA. 

2 Burdett AN. 1983. Quality control in the production of forest planting stock. The Forestry Chronicle 59:132-138. 

3 Cain ML, Subler S, Evans JP, Fortin MJ. 1999. Sampling spatial and temporal variation in soil nitrogen availability. Oecologia 118:397-404. 

4  Chapin FS. III. 1980. The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:233-260. 

5 Carlson WC. 1986. Root system considerations in the quality of loblolly pine seedlings. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 10:87-92. 

6  Climent J, Chambel MR, Pardos M, Lario F, Villar-Salvador P. 2011. Biomass allocation and foliage heteroblasty in hard pine species respond differentially to reduction in rooting volume. European Journal of Forest Research 130:841–850. 

7 Cox MS. 2001. The Lancaster soil test method as an alternative to the Mehlich 3 soil test method1. Soil Science 166:484-489. 

8  Dominguez-Lerena S, Sierra NH, Manzano IC, Bueno LO, Rubira JP and Mexal JG. 2006. Pot characteristics influence Pinus pinea seedling development in the nursery and field. Forest Ecology and Management 221:63-71. 

9 Drew MC, Saker LR. 1978. Nutrient supply and the growth of the seminal root system in barley. III. Compensatory increases in growth of lateral roots, and the rates of phosphate uptake in response to a localized supply of phosphate. Journal of Experimental Botany 29:435-451. 

10 Fransen B, de Kroon H, Berendse F. 2001. Soil nutrient heterogeneity alters competition between two perennial grass species. Ecology 82:2534-2546. 

11 Granato TC, Raper JR CD. 1989. Proliferation of maize (Zea mays L.) roots in response to localized supply of nitrate. Journal of Experimental Botany 40:263-275. 

12 Gross KL, Pregitzer KS, Burton AJ. 1995. Spatial variation in nitrogen availability in three successional plant communities. Journal of Ecology 1995:357-367. 

13 Hobbs SD, Lavender DP, Wearstler KA. 1982. Performance of container-grown Douglas-fir on droughty sites in southwest Oregon, pp. 373-378. In Scarratt JB, Glerum C and Plexman CA, (Eds) Proceedings, Canadian Containerized Tree Seedling Symposium. Department of Environment, Canadian Forestry Service., Great Lakes Forest Research Center., Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. Canada. 

14 Hodge A. 2004. The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients. New phytologist 162:9-24. 

15 Hutchings MJ, de Kroon H. 1994. Foraging in plants: The role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition. Advances in Ecological Research 25:159-238. 

16 Jackson RB, Caldwell MM. 1993. The scale of nutrient heterogeneity around individual plants and its quantification with geostatistics. Ecology 74:612-614. 

17 Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED. 1996. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108:389–411. 

18 Jacobs DF, Goodman RC, Gardiner ES, Salifu KF, Overton RP, Hernandez G. 2012. Nursery stock quality as an indicator of bottomland hardwood forest restoration success in the lower Mississippi river alluvial valley. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 27:255-269. 

19 Kim CH, Choi JM. 2016. Influence of pre-planting application of dolomite at various rates in coir-dust containing root media on the growth of red-leaf lettuce. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 43:176-185. 

20 Kozlowski TT, Davies WJ. 1975. Control of water balance in western hemlock seedlings from various dormancy induction transplanted trees. Arboriculture 1:1-10. 

21 Kuo S. 1996. Phosphorus. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3 – Chemical Methods edited by Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH. pp. 869-919. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA. 

22 Leskovar DI, Cantliffe DJ and Stoffella PJ. 1990. Root growth and root-shoot interaction in transplants and direct seeded pepper plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany 30:349-354. 

23 McCreary DD and Duryea ML. 1985. OSU vigor test: Principles, procedures, and predictive ability. Methods of Soil and Plant Analysis. In Im JN, editor. 2000. pp. 1-202. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA, Suwon, Korea.  

24 Nelson DW, Sommers LE. 1996. Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3 – Chemical Methods edited by Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH. pp. 961-1010. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.  

25 NeSmith DS, Duval JR. 1998. The effect of container size. HortTechnology 8:495-498. 

26 Pande A, Pandey P, Kaushik S. 2017. Co-inoculation of Burkholderia cepacia and Alcaligenes aquatilis enhances plant growth of maize (Zea mays) under green house and field condition. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 44:196-210. 

27 Poorter H, Bühler J, van Dusschoten D, Climent J, Postma JA. 2012a. Pot size matters: A meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth. Functional Plant Biology 39:839-850. 

28 Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Poot P, Mommer L. 2012b. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytologist 193:30-50. 

29 Rietveld WJ. 1989. Transplanting stress in bareroot conifer seedlings: Its development and progression to establishment. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 6:99-107. 

30 Ritchie GA. 1984. Assessing seedling quality. In Forestry nursery manual: Production of bareroot seedlings. pp. 243-259. Springer, Hague, Netherlands. 

31 Robinson D. 1994. The responses of plants to non-uniform supplies of nutrients. New Phytologist 127:635-674. 

32 Robinson D and van Vuuren MM. 1998. Responses of wild plants to nutrient patches in relation to growth rate and life-form.Variation in plant growth. pp. 237-257. Backhuys, Leiden, Netherlands.  

33 Robbins NS, Pharr DM. 1988. Effect of restricted root growth on carbohydrate metabolism and whole plant growth of Cucumis sativus L. Plant Physiology 87:409-413. 

34 Ryel RJ, Caldwell MM, Manwaring JH. 1996. Temporal dynamics of soil spatial heterogeneity in sagebrush-wheatgrass steppe during a growing season. Plant and Soil 184:299-309. 

35 Sands R. 1984. Transplanting stress in radiata pine. Australian forest research 14:67-72. 

36 Sinclair TR, Horie T. 1989. Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, and crop radiation use efficiency: A review. Crop Science 29:90-98. 

37 Sumner ME, Miller WP. 1996. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3–Chemical Methods 1996:1201-1229. 

38 Timmis R. 1980. Stress resistance and quality criteria for tree seedlings: analysis, measurement and use. New Zealand Journal of Science 10:21-53. 

39 Tonutti P, Giulivo C. 1990. Effect of available soil volume on growth of young kiwi plants (1). Acta Horticulturae 282:283-290. 

40  Walkley A, Black IA. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37:29-38.