Influence of sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate emulsifier on growth performance and nutrient digestibility of growing pig

Research
Md Raihanul Hoque1In Ho Kim1*

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate (SSL) emulsifier on the growth performance and nutrient digestibility of growing pigs. For this 56-day long-duration experiment, 80 heads of cross-bred ([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc) pigs with an initial body weight of 23.80 ± 4.87 kg were divided into two (2) treatment groups each fed a different diet: with and without an emulsifier. Each treatment group had 8 replication pens with 5 pigs per pen. Feed treatments were as follows: 1) CON: Basal diet, and 2) SSL: CON + 0.05% SSL. Body weight (BW), average daily gain (ADG), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were measured for three periods: 0 - 4, 5 - 8, and 0 - 8 weeks. The nutrient digestibility parameters consisting of dry matter (DM) digestibility and nitrogen (N) digestibility were calculated on the 4th and 8th week. Based on the results, the SSL supplementation did not show any significant influence on the growth performance parameters during the 0 to 4 and 5 to 8 week phases. For the overall performance, only the FCR (p = 0.048) was significantly different in the emulsifier fed group (SSL) compared to the CON group (T1). DM and N digestibility was also not influenced by the SSL addition in the growing pig diet. Overall, the SSL supplementation showed a limited effect on the growth performance of growing pigs.

Keyword



Introduction

In commercial farming, profit depends highly upon supplying balanced and economic feed. Growing pigs need a balanced diet that provides enough energy for their maintenance and production. Energy sources are not less expensive, so energy levels should be in good consideration during feed formulation. Oils and fats are important sources of energy in diet and emulsifiers are used for improving fat digestibility and energy utilization (Yin et al., 2018). But, fat globules are not readily available for enzymatic action. So, we need to emulsify them to decrease the size of fat globules and increase the total available surface area for enzymatic digestion. As emulsifiers, phospholipids, lecithin, and lysolecithin were found effective especially in weaning pigs and broilers (Krogdahl, 1985; Jones et al., 1992; Gheiser et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2015; Bai et al., 2019). For reason, newly hatched broilers and weaning pigs have an immature digestive system that has restricted bile salts and lipase secretion. Bile salts and lipase are essential for fat digestion. So, exogenous emulsifiers work effectively in broiler and weaning pigs. On the contrary, growing pigs have developed a digestive system that may reduce the necessity of exogenous emulsifiers in the diet. Though Sun et al. (2019) found a significant effect of lecithin in growing pigs, most emulsifiers showed less effective results in the growth performance of growing pigs.

Sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate (E 481 SSL) is an emulsifier that is comprised of sodium salts of stearoyl lactic acid and other salts of related acids in minor proportions. It is formulated by esterification of commercial stearic acid with lactic acid, followed by sodium salt neutralization. SSL also showed a significant effect on broiler growth performance (Gheiser et al., 2015; Ali et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2020). Hardly any study has been conducted on the effect of SSL on growing pigs. Therefore, the objective of our study was to determine the impact of SSL supplementation in growing pig’s growth performance and nutrient digestibility.

Materials and Methods

Experimental management, treatment, and care of animal was approved (DK-4-1345) by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Dankook University, South Korea.

Emulsifier source

The tested product was sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate composed of 95% sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate and 5% starch supplied by a local company (Il Shin Wells, Seoul, Korea). It was formulated by esterification of commercially available stearic acid with lactic acid and then neutralized with sodium salts.

Animals, diets and facilities

The sample population was comprised of a total of 80 ([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc) pigs of 23.80 ± 4.87 kg initial body weight. This experiment was conducted for 8 weeks feeding trial divided into two phases, 0 to 4 weeks, and 5 to 8 weeks. Animals were randomly assigned to three treatments according to their body weight and sex (2 gilts + 3 barrows per pen). Each treatment had 8 replication pens. Feeding treatments were 1) T1, control basal diet; T2, T1 + 0.05% sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate emulsifier. All diets (Table 1) were comprised in a way to meet or exceed the nutrient requirement of NRC (2012) for pigs. All pigs were raised in an environment controlled house with a slated plastic floor where each pen was supplied with a self-feeder and nipple waterer to provide ad libitum access to feed and water.

Sampling and measurements

At the starting of the experiment, at the end of week 4 and week 8, the body weight of each pig was measured and average daily gain (ADG) was estimated. At the same time, feed intake was recorded on a cumulative basis on pens to calculate average feed intake (FI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR). At the end of the 3rd week and 7th week pigs were fed a diet mixed with chromium oxide (Cr2O3, 0.2%) as an indigestible marker to estimate the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of dry matter (DM) and nitrogen (N). In the last two days of each phase, fecal samples were collected by anal massaging from each pig pooled based on a pen. Fecal samples and feed samples were stored in a -20℃ freezer until analysis. Fecal samples were dried at 70℃ for 72 hours and grounded finely to pass through a 1 mm screening sieve. The DM and N content were analyzed according to (Method 930.15; AOAC, 2005) and (Method 990.03; AOAC, 2005). The chromium content was measured by UV absorption spectrophotometry (Shimadzu UV-1201, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) according to Williams et al. (1962). ATTD was calculated according to the following formula.

Table 1. Composition of growing pig diets (as fed-basis).

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/images/N0030480109_image/Table_KJOAS_48_01_09_T1.png

SBM, soybean meal; DDGS, dried distillers grains; ME, metabolizable energy; NE, net energy.

y Provided per kg diet: Fe, 115 mg as ferrous sulfate; Cu, 70 mg as copper sulfate; Mn, 20 mg as manganese oxide; Zn, 60 mg as zinc oxide; I, 0.5 mg as potassium iodide; and Se, 0.3 mg as sodium selenite.

z Provided per kilograms of diet: Vitamin A, 13,000 IU; vitamin D3, 1,700 IU; vitamin E, 60 IU; vitamin K3, 5 mg; vitamin B1, 4.2 mg; vitamin B2, 19 mg; vitamin B6, 6.7 mg; vitamin B12, 0.05 mg; biotin, 0.34 mg; folic acid, 2.1 mg; niacin, 55 mg; D-calcium pantothenate, 45 mg.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/images/N0030480109_image/Eq_KJOAS_48_01_09_eq1.png (1)

where, Nf = nutrient concentration in feces (% DM), Nd = nutrient concentration in diet (% DM), Cd = chromium concentration in diet (% DM), and Cf = chromium concentration in feces (% DM).

Statistical analysis

This experiment was designed for t-test analysis. Each treatment comprised of 8 replication pens with 5 pigs·pen-1. Pigs were allocated in pens according to their body weight and sex. Then pens were divided into treatments randomly. All data were analyzed by t-test using SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). A probability level of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Growth performance

The results of the supplementation of 0.05% SSL in the diet of growing pigs are presented in Table 2. In the 1st phase (0 to 4 wk) SSL supplemented diet did not bring any significant difference (p > 0.05) in BW, ADG, and ADFI. But, it reduced (p = 0.006) FCR in the emulsifier supplemented group compare to the CON group. In the 2nd phase (4 to 8 wk) BW, ADG, ADFI and FCR did not vary (p > 0.05) between CON and SSL groups. Interestingly, in overall measurement emulsifier supplementation showed improvement in FCR (p = 0.048) compared to the control diet (CON) group, though ADG and ADFI showed no significant difference (p > 0.05).

Table 2. Effect of emulsifier supplementa tion on growth performance of growing pigs.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/images/N0030480109_image/Table_KJOAS_48_01_09_T2.png

8 replicate pens per treatment, 2 gilt and 5 barrows pen-1.

CON, basal diet; SSL, CON + 0.05% sodium stearoyl-2- lactylate; SEM, standard error of means; ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; FCR, feed conversion ratio.

a, b: Means in the same row with different superscript differ significantly (p < 0.05).

Nutrient digestibility

The effects of SSL emulsifier supplementation in growing pigs are shown in Table 3. During week 4, 0.05% SSL supplementation did not influence (p > 0.05) the digestibility of N and DM in the SSL group compared to the CON group. Consequently, emulsifier supplementation showed no improvement in N and DM digestibility during week 8.

Table 3. Effect of emulsifier supplementa tion in nutrient digestibili ty of growing pigs.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/images/N0030480109_image/Table_KJOAS_48_01_09_T3.png

8 replicate pens per treatment, 2 gilt and 2 barrows pen-1.

CON, basal diet; SSL, CON + 0.05% sodium stearoyl-2- lactylate; SEM, standard error of means.

Discussion

The effect of emulsifiers in animal growth performance showed different effects according to species and their stage of growth. Again each emulsifier variously acted depending on the source of fat or oil. In broiler chicken, Gheiser et al. (2015); Ali et al. (2017) and Liu et al. (2020) found SSL and other emulsifiers effective that change ADG and FCR positively. SSL supplementation also brought significant changes in weaning pigs (Bai et al., 2019). As there is a scarce of reports of SSL emulsifiers on growing pig growth performance, our findings are compared with other emulsifiers used in growing pigs’ diet and pigs of different ages.

Santos et al. (2017) and Li et al. (2017) reported that the application of emulsifiers such as lecithin and glycerol polyethylene glycol respectively in growing pigs have shown improvement in FCR. However, Yun et al. (2019) and Yin et al. (2019) used SSL emulsifier on finishing and growing pig respectively. Their reports showed no significant difference in BW, ADG, ADFI, and FCR parameters. The fully developed digestive system in growing-finishing pigs may be responsible for no differences in growth parameters. When in young pigs, the digestive system was less developed emulsifiers showed a significant effect on growth performance (Krogdahl, 1985; Bai et al., 2019). However, in growing animals and finishing animals, the developed digestive system reduced the impact of emulsifiers on growth performance (Yun et al., 2019). There are not enough existing literature explaining the significant change of FCR in our experiment. Long time continuous use of SSL emulsifier may have brought this change in FCR. In different phases, the mean value of ADG and FCR of the SSL group was always better than CON though not significant. This improvement of FCR could not bring significant changes to the ADG and BW.

The digestibility of nutrients like DM and N were not significant, maybe due to the developed digestive system of growing pigs. There are some limitations to this experiment. Fat source and fat digestibility were not considered. Since emulsifier breaks down lipid particles and provides more nutrition to the animal, lipid digestibility should have been considered. Lipid digestibility could have caused the changes in the FCR. It is possible that the increased lipid digestion reduced the FCR of the pig from 0 to 4 wk and the overall period.

Conclusion

In conclusion, dietary supplementation of SSL in the growing pig diet showed a very confined effect on growth performance. Even though only FCR was decreased in SSL supplied group, we still have a chance of further experiment about SSL in growing pig feed considering above mentioned missing factors and using higher doses.

Conflict of Interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Authors Information

Md Raihanul Hoque, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9334-6876

In Ho Kim, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6652-2504

References

1 Ali SF, Chao W, Xiaoli W, Jintian H, Mingfa W, Abd El-Hack ME, Lili Z, Xiang Z, Tian W. 2017. Growth, serum biochemical indices, antioxidant status and meat quality of broiler chickens fed diet supplemented with sodium stearoyl-2 lactylate. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 37:445-449.  

2 AOAC (Association of Office Analytical Chemists). 2005. Official method of analysis, 16th edition. AOAC, Washington, D.C., USA.  

3 Bai G, He W, Yang Z, Fu H, Qiu S, Gao F, Shi B. 2019. Effects of different emulsifiers on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and digestive enzyme activity in weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 97:4235-4241. doi:10.1093/jas/skz276  

4 Gheiser MM, Hosseindoust A, Kim HB, Kim IH. 2015. Effects of lysolecithin and sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in broilers. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 42:133-137. doi:10.5536/KJPS.2015.42.2.133  

5 Jones DB, Hancock JD, Harmon DL, Walker CE. 1992. Effects of exogenous emulsifiers and fat sources on nutrient digestibility, serum lipids, and growth performance in weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 70:3473-3482.  

6 Krogdahl A. 1985. Digestion and absorption of lipids in poultry. Journal of Nutrition 115:675-685.  

7 Li TS, Liu WC, Zhao PY, Kim IH. 2017. Evaluation of essential oil or/and emulsifier in low energy density diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood cholesterol and meat quality in finishing pigs. Italian Journal of Animal Science 16:624-630. doi:10.1080/1828051X.2017.1325718  

8 Liu X, Yun KS, Kim IH. 2020. Evaluation of sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate and 1, 3-diacylglycerol blend supplementation in diets with different energy content on the growth performance, meat quality, apparent total tract digestibility, and blood lipid profiles of broiler chickens. Journal of Poultry Science 50:55-62. doi:10.2141/jpsa.0190007  

9 NRC (National Research Council). 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine, 11th Ed. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.  

10 Santos KM, Watanabe PH, Freitas ER, Nepomuceno RC, Oliviera PJD, Lima VM, Rodrigues BBV, Do Nascimento GAJ, De Carvalho LE. 2017. Beef tallow and emulsifier in growing-finishing pig diets. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 89:1221-1230. doi:10.1590/0001-3765201720160500  

11 Sun HY, Yoon YB, Kim IH. 2019. Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood lipid profile and faecal Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus counts on growing pigs fed with de-oiled lecithin emulsifier. Italian Journal of Animal Science 18:1111-1116. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2019.1620140  

12 Williams CH, David DJ, Iismaa O. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Journal of Agricultural Science 59:381-385.  

13 Yin J, Jiao Y, Kim YM, Kim IH. 2019. Effects of reducing dietary energy (tallow) in diets containing emulsifier blend on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood profile in growing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 99:206-209. doi:10.1139/cjas-2017-0155  

14 Yin J, Yun HM, Kim IH. 2018. Effects of supplemental glycerol polyethylene glycol ricinoleate in different energy density diets on the growth performance, blood profiles, nutrient utilization, and excreta gas emission of broilers: Focus on dietary glycerol polyethylene glycol ricinoleate in broilers. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 45:219-228.  

15 Yun HM, Yun KS, Upadhaya SD, Kim IH. 2019. Effect of supplementation of sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate as fat emulsifier in low-density diet on growth performance, backfat thickness, lean muscle percentage, and meat quality in finishing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 99:132-137. doi:10.1139/cjas-2017-0206  

16 Zhao PY, Li HL, Hossain MM, Kim IH. 2015. Effect of emulsifier (lysophospholipids) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and blood profile in weanling pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 207:190-195.