Gao, Hossain, and Kim: Evaluation of the impact of phytase supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and fecal score of growing pigs

Shanshui GaoMd Mortuza HossainIn Ho Kim

Abstract

Phytase enhances phosphorus availability in pig diets by breaking down phytic acid, which is challenging for animals to digest. This study aimed to assess the impact of dietary phytase supplementation on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and fecal score of growing pigs. Sixty-four growing pigs ([Yorkshire × Landrace] × Duroc, average body weight 21.20 ± 0.18 kg) were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The dietary treatments were CON, basal diet, and PHY, basal diet + 0.0025% phytase. Results indicated a tendency for increased average daily gain in the phytase-supplemented diet group (p < 0.10) compared to the control diet group. The average daily feed intake and feed conversion ratio were not affected by the addition of 0.0025% phytase. Furthermore, dry matter digestibility, nitrogen content, and digestible energy were not influenced (p > 0.05) by phytase supplementation. Fecal score remained similar (p > 0.05) in growing pigs fed phytase-supplemented and control diets. These findings suggest that supplementing the diet of growing pigs with 0.0025% phytase may lead to improved average daily gain without adverse effects on nutrient digestibility and fecal score. This implies the potential to enhance growth performance without compromising overall health or digestion in pigs. Further investigations into the optimal levels of phytase supplementation for growing pigs are recommended.

Keyword



Introduction

Phosphorus is an important element for various physiological functions such as growth, bone formation, and energy metabolism in pigs (Zhai et al., 2022). This mineral mainly enters their diet through plant-based food sources in a form known as phytate or phytic acid. However, swine and other monogastric animals have limited capabilities to digest phytic acid. Phosphorus often commands a high price due to its critical role in animal health and the cost of its digestible forms, making it typically the second or third most expensive component in dietary supplements, after energy and protein supplementation (Satter et al., 2005; Moe, 2008). Because of the low phytase activity in digestive systems, monogastric animals cannot efficiently utilize or access phytate-bound phosphorus. As a result, this undigested phytate phosphorus is expelled, contributing to environmental pollution, notably in regions with intensive animal farming (Chen et al., 2007; Humer et al., 2015). Excess phosphorus from industrial effluents and agricultural runoff frequently enters lakes via sewage, acting as a significant contributor to eutrophication (Abbasi et al., 2019). The phenomena of eutrophication, which triggers harmful algal blooms, depletes oxygen, and causes nutrient over-saturation in water bodies (Heisler et al., 2008).

To solve the problem of phosphorus digestibility, phytase are used in animal diet. Phytase is an enzyme that breaks down phytate into simpler inorganic phosphates and inositol phosphates, for this reason it is incorporated into commercial pig diets (Hirvonen et al., 2019). Derived from various microorganisms like Aspergillus spp., Buttiauxella sp., Citrobacter braakii, Escherichia coli, Hafnia spp., and Peniophora lycii, distinct microbial phytase products are now commercially accessible. Notably, three commonly used phytase feed enzymes are sourced from A. niger (3-phytase - EC 3.1.3.8) and Peniophora lycii and Escherichia coli (6-phytases - EC 3.1.3.26) (Šefer et al., 2012). By increasing the bioavailability of phosphorus and other phytate-bound nutrients, phytase enhances nutrient utilization and mitigates the environmental impact of pig farming (Humer et al., 2015). It has been observed to improve the absorption of amino acids, energy, and other minerals like calcium in pig diets (Cowieson et al., 2017; Gallardo et al., 2020). However, Zhai et al. (2021) reported that phytase had no significant influence on the digestibility of dry matter, crude protein, and gross energy or the performance of the sows and their offspring. The impact of phytase appears to be more evident as dietary phytate levels increase, a trend observed in both poultry (Ravindran et al., 2006) and pigs (Selle et al., 2003). Thus, the supplementation of phytase is being increasingly recognized as a viable technique to boost the availability of phosphorus in plant ingredients with high phytate content (Selle and Ravindran, 2008).

Most of the available research affirms positive results with phytase supplementation exceeding 500 Phytase units (FTU)/kg feed for growing pigs (Madrid et al., 2013; Dersjant-Li et al., 2017; Grela et al., 2020). However, there are very few research that check the effectiveness of lower phytase doses. We set out to examine the potency of a low dose (250 FTU/kg) phytase supplementation, assessing its impact on pigs’ growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and fecal score. If lower doses of phytase prove to be effective, farmers may be able to reduce their costs while also lessening the environmental footprint of pig farming. The objective of this study is to check the growth performance, nutrient digestibility and fecal score in growing pig fed 0.0025% phytase (250 FTU/kg).

Materials and Methods

All procedures and protocols involving the care and use of animals in this research were carefully reviewed and formally approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Dankook University, South Korea (Ethical approval number: DK-22227).

Information of phytase

The commercial name of the phytase used in this experiment was HiPhoriusTM, which was supplied by a commercial company (DSM Nutritional Products AG, Netherlands). HiPhoriusTM is a fourth generation phytase. The active agent of the product (HiPhoriusTM) is a 6-phytase, produced from Aspergillus oryzae. According to the company, the concentration of phytase in the product was 10,000 to 50,000 FTU/g for the solid product. Additionally, HiPhoriusTM is intended to be included through premixtures or directly in feedstuffs to obtain a minimum activity of 200 FTU/kg feedstuffs for pigs. A single phytase unit, or FTU, is determined as the quantity of enzyme required to liberate one micromole of phosphate from phytate each minute, under specific conditions of 37℃ and a pH level of 5.5 (Dang et al., 2022).

Animals, experimental design, and feeding regimen

A total of 64 crossbred ([Landrace × Yorkshire] (F1), F1 × Duroc) growing pigs with an average body weight (BW) of 21.20 ± 0.18 kg were divided into two groups in a complete random block design with 8 replicates and 4 pigs (2 gilts and 2 borrows) per pen. Dietary treatment diet were, CON, basal diet; and PHY, 0.0025% phytase. The basal diets used in this study were formulated in such a way to either meet or surpass the nutrient requirements recommended by the National Research Council (NRC, 2012) (Table 1). The experimental pens were equipped with self-feeders and nipple drinkers, enabling the growing pigs to have unrestricted access to feed and water throughout the entire duration of the trial. To maintain a consistent ambient temperature of approximately 25℃ within the facility, a ventilation control system was installed.

Table 1

Ingredient composition of experimental diets as-fed basis.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/KJOAS/N0030500406-t1.png

Sampling and measurements

The body weight of individual growing pigs was measured at the starting day and the ending day of the experiment. Total feed intake per pen was calculated through deducting the remaining feed from the given feed. Average daily gain, average daily feed intake and feed conversion ratio was calculated from the data of total feed intake and body weight.

To determine the digestibility of dry matter, nitrogen and digestible energy, fresh excreta were taken on the last three days of week 1 and week 2. About seven days before the day of fecal sample collection, 0.2% chromic oxide (Cr2 O3 , 98.5%, Samchun Pure Chemical Co., Ltd., Korea) was mixed with treatment diet as an indigestible marker. Fecal sample was collected from every experimental pen and after collection they were dried at 60℃ for 72 hours, and then subjected to AOAC-standard techniques for determining dry matter (methods 934.01), and nitrogen (methods 968.06) (AOAC, 2005). Gross energy was measured using bomb caloriemeter (Parr Instrument Company, USA). An atomic absorption spectrophotometry was used to determine the amount of chromium (UV-1201, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan). Apparent total tract digestibility (%) = (1 - (Nf × Cd)/(Nd × Cf) × 100), where Nf represents nutrient concentration in feces (percent dry matter), Nd represents nutrient concentration in diet (percent dry matter), Cf represents chromium concentration in feces (percent dry matter), and Cd represents chromium concentration in diet (percent dry matter).

The fecal score of the growing pigs was assessed on a daily basis and calculated weekly. Two trained personnel checked the fecal score unbiasedly during the whole experimental period. The occurrence of diarrhoea was determined by employing a 5-grade scoring system. Grade 1 denoted the presence of hard, dry pellets in a compact, solid mass, while grade 2 indicated well-formed stool that remained firm yet soft. Grade 3 represented soft, formed, and moist stool that retained its shape. Grade 4 corresponded to soft, unformed stool that conformed to the shape of the container, and grade 5 indicated the presence of watery liquid stool that could be poured.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test in SAS software (version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., USA). Variation in the data was referred to as standard error of mean (SEM). And p < 0.05 is considered as significant difference whereas p < 0.10 is considered as tendency.

Results

The effect of dietary phytase at 0.0025% on the growth performance of growing pigs are shown in Table 2. Average daily gain on the phytase supplemented diet intended to increase (p < 0.10) compared to the control diet. However, average daily feed intake and feed conversion ratio was not changed (p > 0.05) through the supplementation of phytase in growing pig at 0.0025%.

Digestibility of dry matter, nitrogen and energy in different treatment group are shown in Table 3. Addition of phytase at 0.0025% did not showed any significant effect (p > 0.05) on the digestibility in growing pigs.

Fecal score in growing pigs were not altered (p > 0.05) through the supplementation of dietary phytase at 0.0025% (Table 4).

Table 2

Effect of dietary phytase supplementation on growth performance in growing pigs.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/KJOAS/N0030500406-t2.png
Table 3

Effect of dietary phytase supplementation on nutrient digestibility in growing pigs.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/KJOAS/N0030500406-t3.png
Table 4

Effect of dietary phytase supplementation on fecal score in growing pigs.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/KJOAS/N0030500406-t4.png

Discussion

Growth

The present study investigated the effect of phytase at 0.0025% (250 FTU/kg) supplementation on the average daily gain in growing pigs, while examining whether feed intake and feed efficiency were affected. In a previous study, Guggenbuhl et al. (2016), Dersjant-Li et al. (2017), da Silva et al. (2019) reported that pigs fed a phytase supplemented had improved growth performance. The improvement in growth suggests that phytase supplementation can enhance the overall productivity and performance of growing pigs. The addition of microbial phytase to the diet works to break down the complex formed between phytate and other nutrient ingredients in the stomach. This action results in a heightened level of nutrients that can be absorbed, subsequently enhancing the growth performance of the animal (Dang et al., 2022). Moreover, in this study the observed feed intake and feed efficiency of the pigs were not significantly altered by phytase supplementation. This result suggests that the increased growth observed in the phytase group was not solely attributed to changes in feed consumption. It is possible that the enhanced availability of phosphorus and other key minerals facilitated by phytase supplementation played a crucial role in promoting growth without influencing feed intake or efficiency (Rizwanuddin et al., 2023). The level of breakdown of nutrient ingredient-phytate complexes can be gauged by tracking the variations in the digestibility of phosphorus (Jolliff and Mahan, 2012). By incorporating phytase at 0.0025% into growing pig diets, producers can potentially optimize growth performance without adversely affecting feed intake or efficiency. This offers an opportunity to improve profitability and sustainability in pig production systems by reducing the reliance on inorganic phosphorus sources, which can be costly and environmentally detrimental. However, we suggest that higher dose of phytase in growing pig diet may show better results in growth performance and feed intake, which is also suggested by Dang and Kim (2021).

Nutrient digestibility

In the present study phytase supplementation at 0.0025% (250 FTU/Kg) did not alter the digestibility of dry matter, nitrogen, and energy in growing pigs. Our findings align with the studies conducted by Rosenfelder-Kuon et al. (2020), where it was reported that phytase did not significantly alter the digestibility of dry matter, nitrogen, and energy. Similarly, Moita and Kim (2022) explained that 6-phytase supplemented above the traditional levels (500 - 1,000 FTU/kg feed) showed improvement in the nursery pigs. Contrarily, a few studies found improved nutrient digestibility growing or finishing pigs when phytase was supplemented at 1,000 to 3,000 FTU/kg diet (Thacker et al., 2006; Velayudhan et al., 2015). One possible explanation for this findings in our experiment could be that the level of phytase supplementation was insufficient to induce a noticeable improvement in the digestibility of these nutrients. By breaking down phytic acid, phytase not only makes phosphorus more available but also improves the bioavailability of other nutrients. Phytic acid can bind minerals such as calcium, zinc, and iron, and amino acids, making them less accessible for absorption. By degrading phytic acid, phytase liberates these nutrients, thus improving their absorption (Selle and Ravindran, 2007). The action of phytase and its effectiveness in improving nutrient absorption could be influenced by numerous factors, including diet composition, feed processing, animal age and physiological status, as well as pH conditions in the gastrointestinal tract (Dersjant-Li et al., 2015; Singh et al., 2018). Based on our results, supplementation of phytase at a low level (250 FTU/kg) might not be adequate to enhance the digestibility of these nutrients.

Fecal Score

Phytase hydrolyzes phytate into available phosphorus and other nutrients (Rizwanuddin et al., 2023). This reaction occurs under favorable pH conditions, primarily in the stomach and small intestine of the pig (Hirvonen et al., 2019). If the digestion process experiences any abnormalities, these disruptions are likely to manifest through changes in the fecal score. The fecal score serves as a useful indicator of gut health and digestive efficiency (Vandeputte et al., 2016). A change in fecal score can indicate alterations in gut motility, microbial balance, and nutrient absorption (Wen et al., 2018). Our study found no alteration in fecal score in growing pigs supplemented with 0.0025% phytase (or 250 FTU/Kg). For instance, a study by Lagos et al. (2021) also reported no alteration in fecal score in pigs supplemented with phytase at various concentrations. It is possible that the amount of phytate in the diet was not high enough to create a measurable change in fecal score when phytase was added. Several studies have shown that the gut microbiota plays a significant role in fecal consistency and overall gut health (Vandeputte et al., 2016). As phytase can potentially change the available nutrients in the gut, it could influence the microbial composition. However, the fecal score remained unchanged may suggest that the phytase supplementation at the given level did not significantly impact the microbial balance. It is also noteworthy to consider that the host’s physiological state, including the gut pH, enzymatic profile, and intestinal transit time, can significantly influence the efficacy of dietary phytase (Dersjant-Li et al., 2015). Therefore, future studies should consider these factors in understanding the interplay between phytase supplementation, nutrient absorption, and fecal score in pigs.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this findings provide preliminary evidence that a 0.0025% phytase supplementation in the diet of growing pigs could potentially influence growth performance, specifically by exhibiting a trend toward improved average daily gain. However, there was no change to average daily feed intake, feed conversion ratio, digestibility nutrient, fecal score. This indicate the potential for phytase supplementation to enhance growth performance without posing adverse impacts on the overall health and digestion of the animals. However, we suggest that higher dose of phytase (more than 250 FTU) in growing pig diet for longer experimental period could show more noticeable outcome. Moreover, additional investigations are necessary to determine the optimal levels and effects of phytase supplementation for enhancing the growth and nutrient utilization in growing pigs.

Conflict of Interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Authors Information

Shanshui Gao, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1491-2652

Md Mortuza Hossain, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6732-286X

In Ho Kim, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6652-2504

References

1 Abbasi F, Fakhur-un-Nisa T, Liu J, Luo X, Abbasi IH. 2019. Low digestibility of phytate phosphorus, their impacts on the environment, and phytase opportunity in the poultry industry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 1:9469-9479.  

2 AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 2005. Official methods of analysis. 17th Edition. AOAC, Washington, D.C., USA.  

3 Chen R, Xue G, Chen P, Yao B, Yang W, Ma Q, Fan Y, Zhao Z, Tarczynski MC, Shi J. 2007. Transgenic maize plants expressing a fungal phytase gene. Transgenic Research 17:633-643.  

4 Cowieson AJ, Ruckebusch JP, Sorbara JOB, Wilson JW, Guggenbuhl P, Tanadini L, Roos FF. 2017. A systematic view on the effect of microbial phytase on ileal amino acid digestibility in pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 231:138-149.  

5 da Silva CA, Callegari MA, Dias CP, Bridi AM, Pierozan CR, Foppa L, da Silva Martins CC, Dias FTF, Passos A, Hermes R. 2019. Increasing doses of phytase from Citrobacter braakii in diets with reduced inorganic phosphorus and calcium improve growth performance and lean meat of growing and finishing pigs. PLoS ONE 14:e0217490.  

6 Dang DX, Chun SG, Kim IH. 2022. Feeding broiler chicks with Schizosaccharomyces pombe-expressed phytasecontaining diet improves growth performance, phosphorus digestibility, toe ash, and footpad lesions. Animal Bioscience 35:1390-1399.  

7 Dang DX, Kim IH. 2021. Effects of adding high-dosing Aspergillus oryzae phytase to corn–wheat–soybean meal-based basal diet on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, faecal gas emission, carcass traits and meat quality in growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 105:1056-1062.  

8 Dersjant-Li Y, Awati A, Schulze H, Partridge G. 2015. Phytase in non-ruminant animal nutrition: A critical review on phytase activities in the gastrointestinal tract and influencing factors. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 95:878-896.  

9 Dersjant-Li Y, Schuh K, Wealleans AL, Awati A, Dusel G. 2017. Effect of a Buttiauxella phytase on production performance in growing/finishing pigs fed a European-type diet without inclusion of inorganic phosphorus. Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition 5:e4.  

10 Gallardo C, Dadalt JC, Trindade Neto MA. 2020. Carbohydrases and phytase with rice bran, effects on amino acid digestibility and energy use in broiler chickens. Animal 14:482-490.  

11 Grela ER, Muszyński S, Czech A, Donaldson J, Stanisławski P, Kapica M, Brezvyn O, Muzyka V, Kotsyumbas I, Tomaszewska E. 2020. Influence of phytase supplementation at increasing doses from 0 to 1500 FTU/kg on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and bone status in grower–finisher pigs fed phosphorus-deficient diets. Animals 10:847.  

12 Guggenbuhl P, Calvo EP, Fru F. 2016. Effect of high dietary doses of a bacterial 6-phytase in piglets fed a corn-soybean meal diet. Journal of Animal Science 94:307-309.  

13 Heisler J, Glibert PM, Burkholder JM, Anderson DM, Cochlan W, Dennison WC, Dortch Q, Gobler CJ, Heil CA, Humphries E, et al. 2008. Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: A scientific consensus. Harmful Algae 8:3-13.  

14 Hirvonen J, Liljavirta J, Saarinen MT, Lehtinen MJ, Ahonen I, Nurminen P. 2019. Effect of phytase on in vitro hydrolysis of phytate and the formation of myo-inositol phosphate esters in various feed materials. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 67:11396-11402.  

15 Humer E, Schwarz C, Schedle K. 2015. Phytate in pig and poultry nutrition. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 99:605-625.  

16 Jolliff JS, Mahan DC. 2012. Effect of dietary inulin and phytase on mineral digestibility and tissue retention in weanling and growing swine. Journal of Animal Science 90:3012-3022.  

17 Lagos LV, Lee SA, Bedford MR, Stein HH. 2021. Reduced concentrations of limestone and monocalcium phosphate in diets without or with microbial phytase did not influence gastric pH, fecal score, or growth performance, but reduced bone ash and serum albumin in weanling pigs. Translational Animal Science 5:txab115.  

18 Madrid J, Martínez S, López C, Hernández F. 2013. Effect of phytase on nutrient digestibility, mineral utilization, and performance in growing pigs. Livestock Science 154:144-151.  

19 Moe SM. 2008. Disorders involving calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice 35:215-237.  

20 Moita VHC, Kim SW. 2022. Nutritional and functional roles of phytase and xylanase enhancing the intestinal health and growth of nursery pigs and broiler chickens. Animals 12:3322.  

21 NRC (National Research Council). 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine, 11th rev. edition. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.  

22 Ravindran V, Morel PC, Partridge GG, Hruby M, Sands JS. 2006. Influence of an Escherichia coli-derived phytase on nutrient utilization in broiler starter fed diets containing varying concentrations of phytic acid. Poultry Science 85:82-89.  

23 Rizwanuddin S, Kumar V, Naik B, Singh P, Mishra S, Rustagi S, Kumar V. 2023. Microbial phytase: Their sources, production, and role in the enhancement of nutritional aspects of food and feed additives. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 12:100559.  

24 Rosenfelder-Kuon P, Klein N, Zegowitz B, Schollenberger M, Kühn I, Thuringer L, Seifert J, Rodehutscord M. 2020. Phytate degradation cascade in pigs as affected by phytase supplementation and rapeseed cake inclusion in cornsoybean meal-based diets. Journal of Animal Science 98:skaa053.  

25 Satter LD, Klopfenstein TJ, Erickson GE, Powell JM. 2005. Phosphorus and dairy/beef nutrition. In Phosphorus: Agriculture and the Environment edited by Sims JT, Sharpley AN. pp. 587-606. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  

26 Šefer D, Petrujkić B, Marković R, Grdović S, Nestorović B, Bogosavljević V, Kokoškov N, Milić D. 2012. Effect of phytase supplementation on growing pigs performance. Acta Veterinaria 62:627-639.  

27 Selle PH, Cadogan DJ, Bryden WL. 2003. Effects of phytase supplementation of phosphorus-adequate, lysinedeficient, wheat-based diets on growth performance of weaner pigs. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54:323-330.  

28 Selle PH, Ravindran V. 2007. Microbial phytase in poultry nutrition. Animal Feed Science and Technology 135:1-41.  

29 Selle PH, Ravindran V. 2008. Phytate-degrading enzymes in pig nutrition. Livestock Science 113:99-122.  

30 Singh N, Kuhar S, Priya K, Jaryal R, Yadav R. 2018. Phytase: The feed enzyme, an overview. pp. 269-327. Advances in Animal Biotechnology and its Applications. Springer, Singapore.  

31 Thacker PA, Rossnagel BG, Raboy V. 2006. The effects of phytase supplementation on nutrient digestibility, plasma parameters, performance and carcass traits of pigs fed diets based on low phytate barley without inorganic phosphorus. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 86:245-254.  

32 Vandeputte D, Falony G, Vieira-Silva S, Tito RY, Joossens M, Raes J. 2016. Stool consistency is strongly associated with gut microbiota richness and composition, enterotypes and bacterial growth rates. Gut 65:57-62.  

33 Velayudhan DE, Heo JM, Dersjant-Li Y, Owusu-Asiedu A, Nyachoti CM. 2015. Efficacy of novel 6-phytase from Buttiauxella sp. on ileal and total tract nutrient digestibility in growing pigs fed a corn-soy based diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology 210:217-224.  

34 Wen X, Wang L, Zheng C, Yang X, Ma X, Wu Y, Chen Z, Jiang Z. 2018. Fecal scores and microbial metabolites in weaned piglets fed different protein sources and levels. Animal Nutrition 4:31-36.  

35 Zhai H, Adeola O, Liu J. 2022. Phosphorus nutrition of growing pigs. Animal Nutrition 9:127-137.  

36 Zhai H, Cowieson AJ, Pappenberger G, Zhang J, Wu J. 2021. The effect of short-term phytase supplementation on the apparent total tract digestibility of calcium and phosphorus and the reproductive performance of late gestation and lactating sows fed diets without mineral phosphorus. Journal of Animal Science 99:skab194.  

37 Selle PH, Ravindran V. 2008. Phytate-degrading enzymes in pig nutrition. Livestock Science 113:99-122.  

38 Selle PH, Ravindran V. 2008. Phytate-degrading enzymes in pig nutrition. Livestock Science 113:99-122.  

39 Selle PH, Ravindran V. 2008. Phytate-degrading enzymes in pig nutrition. Livestock Science 113:99-122.