Wijesinghe, Rathnayaka, Bandara, Heo, and Jayasena: Analysis of online food purchasing behavior: a study of Sri Lankan consumers

Piyumi Wijesinghe[1]Shashika D. Rathnayaka[2]Niranga Bandara[3]Jung Min Heo[4]Dinesh D. Jayasena[1]

Abstract

Online shopping has been undergoing significant developments in the South Asian region in the last decade. Using a representative sample of Sri Lankan consumers, this study explored online food purchasing behavior in Sri Lanka, a developing nation and island in South Asia. Data were collected from 562 respondents from all nine provinces in Sri Lanka using an online survey. Consumer attitudes were evaluated using factor analysis, and factor scores were added as explanatory variables to the final model. An ordered logistic regression model was used to examine the impact of consumer demographics, economic variables, and consumer attitudes on online food purchases. Online food purchasing intensity was categorized into four groups that suited ordinal rankings: zero for never, low for rarely, medium for occasionally, and high for regularly. Results indicated that age, income, education, and living in urban areas affect the online food purchasing behavior of Sri Lankan consumers. In addition, trust, convenience, and attitudes toward price were powerful drivers of online food purchasing. The findings have a number of significant managerial ramifications for creating strategies to promote online food purchases in developing South Asian nations like Sri Lanka. Moreover, promoting online shopping could be a potential solution for traffic congestion, ultimately helping to mitigate the negative externalities associated with it, such as carbon emissions and air pollution.

Keyword



Introduction

E-commerce is a commercial channel that involves the sale and purchase of goods and services over a technology channel, in this case, the internet. It is a cutting-edge technology made up of network gear, software, and other components that all function together as a single unit to connect people. Worldwide, this technology has been widely adopted so that individuals can connect with one another for both personal and professional reasons by just clicking a mouse from any location at any time. The internet-based e-commerce strategy, as opposed to the conventional brick-and-mortar business model, has been recognized as one of the marketing techniques used by businesses to acquire market share (Johnson et al., 2001; Chang et al., 2005; Zuroni and Goh, 2012; Davis et al., 2021). Many companies have used the internet as a marketing tool because they are concerned that if they do not keep up with technological advancements, their customers may go to rivals instead (Phan and Mohammed, 2003; Nielsen, 2015; Nguyen et al., 2019; Rahman and Hossain, 2023). Since internet technology and applications provide customers with more accessible, more convenient, and less expensive ways to find a wider variety of things than traditional shopping, online shopping has been a rapidly growing industry (Alagoz and Hekimoglu, 2012; Hartono et al., 2014; Nguyen et al., 2019; Davis et al., 2021). Additionally, grocery stores and supermarkets have adopted various approaches to modify their offerings in response to the rising popularity of online shopping. To increase their position in e-commerce, grocery stores have built enticing electronic platforms, including websites and smartphone applications (Dominici et al., 2021). The COVID-19 epidemic has greatly contributed to an increase in online sales and e-commerce that has grown more quickly than before. For instance, during the pandemic in the USA, a ten-year increase in e-commerce penetration was condensed into only three months (Luo et al., 2023).

Being a recently developed e-commerce market, South Asia has a lot of room to grow. The quantity of online shopping portals, the range of products offered online, and the availability of fast internet have all increased steadily in the area during the past ten years. With a population of 22 million people, Sri Lanka is a developing nation in South Asia. In the 1970s, it put into effect trade liberalisation measures. Consumers in Sri Lanka spend more than half of their disposable income on food, and private consumption makes up around 70% of GDP (Rathnayaka et al., 2022). Given the number of businesses that are already selling products and services online, e-commerce appears to have already established itself in Sri Lanka (Wattegama, 2021). Over the past ten years, Sri Lanka’s digital infrastructure facilities have grown to a remarkable level of development. At least 22% of domestic homes in 2020 will have a desktop computer or laptop. Even in rural and estate sectors, that percentage was not lower than 36.3% in urban regions. On the island, 34% of people aged 5 to 69 have access to the internet, with urban areas leading with 52% of users (Department of Census and Statistics, 2020). There are 7.9 million social media users and 30.4 million mobile connections in Sri Lanka (DataReportal, 2021). The boost in Sri Lanka’s digital infrastructure has had a substantial impact on both the retail channel of online shopping and people’s purchasing patterns.

Since e-commerce trends have primarily shifted towards online retail shopping, it is critical to understand the factors affecting online purchase intention in online retail shopping as internet usage and e-commerce activities grow. Globally, the body of literature on internet shopping behaviour has expanded in recent years (Ingham et al., 2015; Lim et al., 2016; Ahmed et al., 2017; Tandon et al., 2017; Khan et al., 2019; Davis et al., 2021). Furthermore, some research has studied the factors influencing consumers’ decisions to use online delivery services or to buy food products, but limited to the West (Hui and Wan, 2009; Naseri and Elliott, 2011; Van Droogenbroeck and Van Hove, 2017; Hamad and Schmitz, 2019; Wang and Somogyi, 2019; Finotto et al., 2020; Hood et al., 2020; Dominici et al., 2021). Only a very few studies have been conducted in the Sri Lankan context (Athapaththu and Kulathunga, 2018; Gamage and Jayatilake, 2019, Perera and Sachitra, 2019). To the best of our knowledge, there are no other comprehensive econometric studies that examine Sri Lankan consumers’ online food shopping behaviors. Hence, this study aimed to bridge this gap by analyzing the online food purchasing behavior of Sri Lankan consumers and elucidating the possible determinants of an individual’s online food purchasing behavior in terms of demographic, economic, and attitudinal factors, employing an ordered logistic regression model. This study included actual online shopping behavior, whereas most earlier studies just looked at the intention to buy food online. As a result, this study adds to the body of literature on technology acceptability and online food purchasing behavior and practically provides new insights into the ways in which various factors influence online food consumers’ purchases in a growing South Asian market. Furthermore, in-depth knowledge of Sri Lankan consumers’ online food purchasing patterns would help online food retailers, policymakers, and international operators create and oversee their campaigns to encourage the purchase of online food goods.

Materials and Methods

Data

Data were collected from 562 respondents from all nine provinces in Sri Lanka using an online survey. Using Yamane’s (1973) formula, the sample size for the study was determined for a large and well-known population ratio. The questionnaire consisted of 33 questions, and each question had several options for the respondents to choose from. Minor changes were made after the questionnaire underwent pre-testing with a sample of 20 respondents.

Data analysis

Both descriptive analysis and ordered logistic regression model estimation were carried out to analyze online food purchasing behavior. The online food purchasing intensity was categorized into four groups that suited ordinal rankings: zero-not at all, low-rarely, medium-occasionally, and high-frequently. Therefore, an ordered logistic regression model was employed in this study to analyze the factors that affect online food purchasing behaviour. Extant research supports that demographic and economic factors and attitudes of consumers are important predictors of online purchasing behaviour (Ingham et al., 2015; Lim et al., 2016; Ahmed et al., 2017; Tandon et al., 2017; Sonwaney and Chincholkar, 2019; Davis et al., 2021; Dominici et al., 2021). Accordingly, online food purchasing behaviour can be expressed as:

Online food purchasing = f(Demographic factors, Economic factors, Attitudes)

Through a review of past studies on online shopping (Limayem et al., 2000; Thananuraksakul, 2007), eight statements were identified and used to represent attitudinal factors in the above regression. On a Likert scale of 1 to 5, where 1 denotes strong disagreement and 5, strong agreement, each customer assigned a score to each statement (Table 1). A factor analysis was conducted to divide the high number of statements into fewer factors using principal component analysis with Varimax rotation in order to avoid the challenge of managing a large number of statements in the regression (Malhotra, 2005).

χi = Ai1 F1 + Ai2 F2 + Ai3 F3 + ...... + Aim Fm + Vi Ui

where,

χi = ith standardized variable

Aim = Standardized multiple regression co-efficient of variable i on common factor m

F = Common factor

Vi = Standardized regression co-efficient of variable i on U

Ui = Unique factor for variable i

m = Number of common factors

The factor scores were calculated for the ith factor as,

Fi = Wi1 x1 + Wi2 x2 + Wi3 x3 + ...... + Wik xk

where,

Fi = Estimate of ith factor

Wi = Weight of factor score coefficient

k = Number of variables

In the aforementioned model of online food shopping behaviour, each element contributed a score that acts as an independent attitude variable.

Table 1

Attitude statements used for factor analysis.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/KJOAS/N0030500427-t1.png

Econometric model

Since the respondents were able to correctly specify their level of online food purchasing, it was used as the dependent variable in the model. It was essential to employ a method that can handle this kind of qualitative variable because the respondents’ level of online food purchase was divided into four categories that are suitable for ordinal rankings, so an ordered logistic regression was used in this research.

Where,

Di was the level of online food purchasing, k factors (determining variable) whose values, for individual i, were xik , k = 1…k, β = k is the coefficient associated with the kth variable. The association between Di and the ordinal likelihood ranking Y was a function of thresholds or cut-off points, δ’s, which are known and can be calculated in addition to β’s. Consequently, the dependent variable can be stated as follows:

Yi = 1

Yi = 2 if DI ≤ δ1

Yi = 3 if δ1 ≤ Di ≤ δ2

Yi = 4 if δ2 ≤ Di ≤ δ3

The probabilities of Yi , if Di ≥ δ3 taking values 1, 2, 3, and 4 are given by,

Pr (Yi = 1) = Pr (εi ≤ δ1 −Zi )

Pr (Yi = 2) = Pr (δ1 −Zi ≤ εi δ2 −Zi )

Pr (Yi = 3) = Pr (δ2 −Zi ≤ εi δ3 −Zi )

Pr (Yi = 4) = Pr (εi ≥ ε3 −Zi )

The model was explained by the marginal effects of the independent variables on the probabilities, which were not the same as the estimated coefficients and then depended on the values of all the independent variables. The marginal effects of the variables were calculated for each of the probabilities as follows.

The following empirical model was developed to show the relationship between the volume of food purchases made online and the demographic, economic, and attitudinal characteristics.

The description of variables for the empirical model is presented in Table 2.

Table 2

Description of variables for the empirical model.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/KJOAS/N0030500427-t2.png

Results and Discussion

Table 3 provides summary statistics for the entire sample. Accordingly, 58% of the respondents were female. Moreover, 68% of the respondents were married, and 32% were single. The majority of the sample (64%) were bachelor’s degree holders, followed by those with a postgraduate degree (18%) and those only with Advanced Level qualifications (16%). Interestingly, 91% of the respondents had internet access. The recent study also showed that social media in particular had a significant impact on online food purchases. These results are to be expected and can be attributed to the internet’s high intractability. Those who are more susceptible to peer pressure would believe their friends’ choices and experiences when they post images or reviews of food products on social media. (Dang et al., 2018). The majority of consumers order online food for their dinner (Table 3). Moreover, the main means of online food purchasing are mobile applications, websites, and direct calls, respectively. Fig. 1 shows the frequency of online food purchases by the respondents. Accordingly, 68% of the respondents are online food buyers. However, only 15% of the sample was found to be frequent food buyers online.

Four variables emerged from a factor analysis of the eight individual attitude statements (Table 4). In the rotated factor matrix, factor 1 is highly related to EASY and TIMESAVY, therefore, this factor was labeled as convenience-related factor. Factor 2 is highly related to variables: PRICECONCERN (Price is my primary concern for purchasing online) and

Table 3

Descriptive sample information.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/KJOAS/N0030500427-t3.png
Fig. 1

Frequency of online food purchasing.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/KJOAS/N0030500427-f1.png
Table 4

Factor loadings, factor structure.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/KJOAS/N0030500427-t4.png

REASNPRICE (I would purchase food online if the prices are reasonable for me). Thus, factor 2 was labeled as Price factor. Factor 3 is highly related to variables; influence from family (FAMILYINF) and influence from friends (FRNDINF). Therefore, factor 3 was labeled as Influence factor. Factor 4 has high coefficients for variables; SECURE and TRUST variables and it was named as Trust factor.

Accordingly, consumer attitudes were categorized into convenience, price, influence, and trust. As discussed previously under equation 2, attitudes (the four factors), and other socio-economic and demographic variables were regressed with the online food purchasing variable, which is an ordered variable. The results of the ordered logistic regression model and marginal effects are presented in Table 5. The marginal effects shed light on how the explanatory variables change the likelihood of purchasing food online frequently at each of the four ordinal levels. To see if the sample data’s findings supported the hypothesized proportion, a likelihood ratio test was performed. Likelihood ratio testing has the same concept as the F test in the linear model. The regression results in Table 5 showed that prob > χ2 is worth 0.000 which is less than 1%. Accordingly, the ordered logistic regression carried out was found to be significant.

According to the marginal effect, if a person’s age increases by one year, the likelihood of being level 1 (never) will increase by 0.09 percentage points, the likelihood of being level 2 (rarely) will decrease by 0.37 percentage points, the likelihood of being level 3 (occasionally) will decrease by 0.02 percentage points, and the likelihood of being level 4

Table 5

Results of the ordered logistic regression and marginal effects.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/KJOAS/N0030500427-t5.png

(frequently) will decrease by 0.37 percentage points. This suggests that younger customers are probably going to choose online grocery shopping more frequently. This result supports the notion that younger people are more tech-savvy and likely to shop online than older people. Older individuals may be less inclined to use online platforms to purchase food items. They may prefer traditional methods of shopping, such as going to physical stores or farmers’ markets. Older individuals might have established long-standing shopping habits that involve visiting physical stores. Furthermore, this relationship between age and online food purchasing is supported by the findings of Hui and Wan (2009), Naseri and Elliott (2011), Van Droogenbroeck and Van Hove (2017), Finotto et al. (2020), and Dominici et al. (2021).

With a significance level of 5%, education had a favorable impact on consumers’ online food shopping decisions. The likelihood of “Rarely”, “Occasionally”, and “Frequently” increasing with respondents’ education level, as shown by the marginal effects, with the likelihood of “Non-buyer” decreasing by 10.7 percentage points as the biggest beneficiary. People with higher levels of education often have better digital literacy skills. They are more comfortable navigating online platforms, making online purchases, and using technology in their daily lives. This comfort can lead to a greater willingness to shop for food online. On the other hand, higher education levels may be associated with busier lifestyles and online food shopping can be seen as a convenient way to save time and avoid the need to physically visit a store. Consumers who are better educated may be more likely to research products, read reviews, and compare prices, all of which can be done more efficiently. Several studies on online shopping (Li et al., 1999; Morganosky and Cude, 2000; Cook et al., 2002; Foucault and Scheufele, 2002; Sim and Koi, 2002; Teo, 2002; Brown et al., 2003; Forsythe and Shi, 2003; Jayawardhena et al., 2003; Mahmood et al., 2004; Sonwaney and Chincholkar, 2019) have found that online buyers typically come from middle management and up and include professionals. They also tend to have greater levels of education and money. Furthermore, the income of households, living in an urban area, and having a stable internet connection positively affected online food purchasing at 5% significance level. Higher-income households often have better access to and familiarity with technology, making them more comfortable with online shopping platforms. Similarly, Hansen (2005), Gan et al. (2007), Wang and Somogyi (2019), and Dominici et al. (2021) have also discovered that those who live in higher-income households are more inclined to shop for groceries online. Urban dwellers are more likely to engage in online food shopping due to the greater accessibility of online retailers and delivery services. In urban areas, a variety of online food shopping options are available, often with shorter delivery times. Urban areas tend to have fast-paced lifestyles, with residents often having busier schedules. Online food shopping offers a convenient way to save time and avoid the hassles of traditional grocery shopping in crowded urban environments. Urban congestion and limited parking spaces can discourage residents from visiting physical stores. Online food shopping provides a solution by eliminating the need for transportation and parking. Urban consumers may also be more environmentally conscious, and online food shopping can be perceived as a greener option, as it reduces the need for individual car trips to stores (Peng, 2019; Bjørgen et al., 2021).

As far as attitudinal factor variables are concerned, trust on the internet significantly and positively affected at 5% significance level. It should come as no surprise that consumers’ trust is thought to be crucial for influencing their decision to make an online purchase (Gefen, 2000; Gefen and Straub, 2004; Martínez-López et al., 2005; Ingham et al., 2015; Anesbury et al., 2016). Trust on the internet suggests that consumers feel confident in conducting transactions and sharing personal information online. When individuals trust that their financial and personal data will be handled securely, they are more willing to make online purchases, including buying food. Additionally, there is evidence in the literature that the trust factor, which affects consumers’ inclination to purchase online, is crucial for online businesses and includes both consumer and computer system trust (George, 2004; Mahmood et al., 2004; Monsuwe et al., 2004). In addition, the findings of Corbitt et al. (2003) support the notion that customers are more likely to visit an online store and more determined to buy a product if there is a higher level of trust established between them and the vendor. Ranganathan and Ganapathy (2002) and Khalifa and Limayem (2003) found website security to be the primary element affecting online shopping and ensuring that users’ f inancial transactions over the Internet are secure from hackers collecting their personal data. Forsythe and Shi (2003) and Smith and Rupp (2003) discovered that internet customers may be hesitant to buy things online due to financial and privacy concerns.

Further, the estimation results of our econometric model revealed that price and convenience significantly and positively influenced online food purchasing levels at 1% significant level. Online food shopping can be perceived as more affordable by consumers compared to traditional brick-and-mortar stores. When prices for food items are competitive or lower online, consumers are more inclined to make purchases through digital platforms. Previous research has also found that people are price-sensitive and seek lower prices while shopping online (Foucault and Scheufele, 2002; Jiang, 2002; Gupta et al., 2004; Saleem et al., 2018). Similarly, Helander and Khalid (2000), Goldsmith and Goldsmith (2002), Khalifa and Limayem (2003), and Lepkowska-White (2004) revealed that online customers are price-conscious and that lower prices have the biggest influence on their intentions. In some nations, bargaining over pricing is another method of purchasing; there are outlets offering discounted goods and services in both brick-and-mortar and internet establishments. This is a benefit of the internet since it allows customers to research products, compare prices, and decide which retailer offers the most satisfying selections (Jiang, 2002).

Online food purchasing reduces the need for customers to physically visit a supermarket or market. This time-saving feature is a big motivator for those with busy schedules, as they can quickly explore, choose, and order food items from the comfort of their homes or workplaces. Similar to our findings, Bellman et al. (1999), Bhatnagar et al. (2000), Helander and Khalid (2000), Morganosky and Cude (2000), Ranganathan and Ganapathy (2002), Gupta et al. (2004), Koiso-Kanttila (2005), Quaddus and Achjari (2005), Aragoncillo and Orus (2018), and Davis et al. (2021) have also confirmed that time saving and convenience are significant factors in online shopping. Because of this, consumers can save time for other activities and be more productive while they purchase online.

Conclusion

Online shopping has seen tremendous growth in the South Asian region over the past decade, with e-commerce expanding into both food and non-food categories. As the domestic and international food markets in the South Asian region become more complex, significant players in the food industry require comprehensive knowledge and understanding of online food purchasing behaviour to set up their strategic planning, online marketing, and promotional campaigns. This paper investigated the probabilistic sensitivity of online food purchases in Sri Lanka concerning consumer demographics, economic variables, and consumer attitudes. The results of the current study will have implications for the South Asian market because the majority of previous studies have been carried out in the West.

The findings of the study suggested that age, income, education, and living in urban areas affect the online food purchasing behavior of Sri Lankan consumers. In addition, trust, convenience factor, and attitudes toward price were powerful drivers of online food purchasing.

In order to safeguard all payment transactions from attackers attempting to steal the code information while they are being processed online from the customer’s site to the seller’s site, the sellers must have a reliable and trustworthy financial payment system. Online stores should allow returns and accept cash on delivery with the aim of boosting customer confidence. These are provided to ensure that online shoppers can return the items and avoid paying in advance if they do not receive what they ordered. Online shoppers’ personal information shouldn’t need to be submitted in order to make a purchase. As previously mentioned, the majority of customers who are asked for their personal information before making a purchase will instantly leave the online store.

In order to safeguard all payment transactions from attackers attempting to steal the code information while they are being processed online from the customer’s site to the seller’s site, the sellers must have a reliable and trustworthy financial payment system. Online stores should allow returns and accept cash on delivery with the aim of boosting customer confidence. These are provided to ensure that online shoppers can return the items and avoid paying in advance if they do not receive what they ordered. Online shoppers’ personal information shouldn’t need to be submitted in order to make a purchase. As previously mentioned, the majority of customers who are asked for their personal information before making a purchase will instantly leave the online store.

Businesses should focus on creating user-friendly and intuitive online shopping interfaces. An easy-to-navigate platform can enhance convenience and attract more users. Online food retailers should employ competitive pricing strategies and promotions to attract price-conscious consumers. Offering discounts, bulk-buying options, and loyalty programs can be effective. They should ensure that product information, pricing, and reviews are clear and easy to find. This promotes trust and allows consumers to make more informed judgments. Sustainability initiatives, such as eco-friendly packaging and sourcing practices can also be incorporated to appeal to environmentally conscious consumers. Food businesses should pay close attention to feedback from customers to understand their specific pain points and preferences. They can use this feedback to make improvements and adjustments.

As was already mentioned, the results of this study have various major managerial implications for creating strategies to promote online grocery shopping in developing South Asian nations like Sri Lanka. Key players such as online food retailers, website developers and managers, and policymakers should collaborate to design and implement such plans. Moreover, promoting online shopping is a potential solution for traffic congestion in metropolitan cities. This will ultimately help mitigate the negative externalities of traffic congestion, such as carbon emissions, air pollution, and fuel consumption. Instead of focusing on food products in general, future studies may take specific food categories into account. Investigating the variations in online food buying amongst groups of customers with various demographic, geographic, and cultural traits would also be valuable.

Conflict of Interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Authors Information

Piyumi Wijesinghe, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6945-8568

Shashika D. Rathnayaka, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7900-1820

Niranga Bandara, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8157-1398

Dinesh D. Jayasena, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2251-4200

Jung Min Heo, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3693-1320

References

1 Ahmed Z, Su L, Rafique K, Khan SZ, Jamil S. 2017. A study on the factors affecting consumer buying behavior towards online shopping in Pakistan. Journal of Asian Business Strategy 7:44-56.  

2 Alagoz SM, Hekimoglu H. 2012. A study on tam: Analysis of customer attitudes in online food ordering system. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 62:1138-1143.  

3 Anesbury Z, Nenycz-Thiel M, Dawes J, Kennedy R. 2016. How do shoppers behave online? An observational study of online grocery shopping. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 15:261-270.  

4 Aragoncillo L, Orus C. 2018. Impulse buying behaviour: An online-offline comparative and the impact of social media. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC 22:42-62.leming K, Hessel EF, Van den Weghe HFA. 2008. Generation of airborne particles from different bedding materials used for horse keeping. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 28:408-418.  

5 Athapaththu JC, Kulathunga KMSD. 2018. Factors affecting online purchase intention: A study of Sri Lankan online customers. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 7:120-128.  

6 Bellman S, Lohse GL, Johnson EJ. 1999. Predictors of online buying behavior. Communications of the ACM 42:32-38.  

7 Bhatnagar A, Misra S, Rao HR. 2000. On risk, convenience, and internet shopping behavior. Communications of the ACM 43:98-105.  

8 Bjørgen A, Bjerkan KY, Hjelkrem OA. 2021. E-groceries: Sustainable last mile distribution in city planning. Research in Transportation Economics 87:100805.  

9 Brown M, Pope N, Voges K. 2003. Buying or browsing? An exploration of shopping orientations and online purchase intention. European Journal of Marketing 37:1666-1684.  

10 Chang MK, Cheung W, Lai VS. 2005. Literature derived reference models for the adoption of online shopping. Information and Management 42:543-559.  

11 Cook AJ, Kerr GN, Moore K. 2002. Attitude and intentions towards purchasing GM food. Journal of Economic Psychology 23:557-572.  

12 Corbitt BJ, Thanasankit T, Yi H. 2003. Trust and e-commerce: A study of consumer perceptions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2:203-215.  

13 Dang AK, Tran BX, Nguyen CT, Le HT, Do HT, Nguyen HD, Nguyen LH, Nguyen TH, Mai HT, Tran TD, et al. 2018. Consumer preference and attitude regarding online food products in Hanoi, Vietnam. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15:981.  

14 DataReportal. 2021. Digital 2021 Sri Lanka. Accessed in https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-sri-lanka on 20 March 2023.  

15 Davis F, Francis Gnanasekar MB, Parayitam S. 2021. Trust and product as moderators in online shopping behavior: Evidence from India. South Asian Journal of Marketing 2:28-50.  

16 Department of Census and Statistics. 2020. Computer literacy statistics - 2020 (first six months). Accessed in http:// www.statistics.gov.lk/PressReleases/ComputerLiteracystatistics-2020-Firstsixmonths on 20 March 2023.  

17 Dominici A, Boncinelli F, Gerini F, Marone E. 2021. Determinants of online food purchasing: The impact of sociodemographic and situational factors. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 60:102473.  

18 Finotto V, Christine M, Procidano I. 2020. Factors Influencing the use of e-commerce in the agri-food sector: An analysis of Italian consumers. Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia Working Paper No. 1/2020.  

19 Forsythe SM, Shi B. 2003. Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping. Journal of Business Research 56:867-875.  

20 Foucault BE, Scheufele DA. 2002. Web vs campus store? Why students buy textbooks online. Journal of Consumer Marketing 19:409-423.  

21 Gamage SK, Jayatilake LVK. 2019. Factors influencing on consumer attitude towards online shopping: An assessment of research. Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies 4:128-134.  

22 Gan L, He S, Huang T, Tan J. 2007. A comparative analysis of online grocery pricing in Singapore. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 6:474-483.  

23 Gefen D. 2000. E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega 28:725-737.  

24 Gefen D, Straub DW. 2004. Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega 32:407-424.  

25 George JF. 2004. The theory of planned behavior and Internet purchasing. Internet Research 14:198-212.  

26 Goldsmith RE, Goldsmith EB. 2002. Buying apparel over the Internet. Journal of Product & Brand Management 11:89102.  

27 Gupta A, Su BC, Walter Z. 2004. Risk profile and consumer shopping behavior in electronic and traditional channels. Decision Support Systems 38:347-367.  

28 Hamad H, Schmitz M. 2019. The impact of demographic variables and consumer shopping orientations on the purchasing preference for different product categories in the context of online grocery shopping. Journal of Marketing and Consumer Research 52:21-32.  

29 Hansen T. 2005. Consumer adoption of online grocery buying: A discriminant analysis. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 33:101-121.  

30 Hartono E, Holsapple CW, Kim KY, Na KS, Simpson JT. 2014. Measuring perceived security in B2C electronic commerce website usage: A respecification and validation. Decision Support Systems 62:11-21.  

31 Helander MG, Khalid HM. 2000. Modeling the customer in electronic commerce. Applied Ergonomics 31:609-619.  

32 Hood N, Urquhart R, Newing A, Heppenstall A. 2020. Sociodemographic and spatial disaggregation of e-commerce channel use in the grocery market in Great Britain. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 55:102076.  

33 Hui TK, Wan D. 2009. Who are the online grocers? The Service Industries Journal 29:1479-1489.  

34 Ingham J, Cadieux J, Berrada AM. 2015. e-Shopping acceptance: A qualitative and meta-analytic review. Information & Management 52:44-60.  

35 Jayawardhena C, Wright LT, Masterson R. 2003. An investigation of online consumer purchasing. Qualitative Market Research 6:58-65.  

36 Jiang P. 2002. A model of price search behavior in the electronic marketplace. Internet Research 12:181-190.  

37 Johnson MD, Gustafsson A, Andreassen TW, Lervik L, Cha J. 2001. The evolution and future of national customer satisfaction index models. Journal of Economic Psychology 22:217-245.  

38 Khalifa M, Limayem M. 2003. Drivers of Internet shopping. Communications of the ACM 46:233-239.  

39 Khan MA, Zubair SS, Malik M. 2019. An assessment of e-service quality, e-satisfaction and e-loyalty: Case of online shopping in Pakistan. South Asian Journal of Business Studies 8:283-302.  

40 Koiso-Kanttila N. 2005. Time, attention, authenticity and consumer benefits of the Web. Business Horizons 48:63-70.  

41 Lepkowska-White E. 2004. Online store perceptions: How to turn browsers into buyers? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 12:36-47.  

42 Li H, Kuo C, Rusell MG. 1999. The impact of perceived channel utilities, shopping orientations, and demographics on the consumer’s online buying behavior. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 5:521.  

43 Lim YJ, Osman A, Salahuddin SN, Romle AR, Abdullah S. 2016. Factors influencing online shopping behavior: The mediating role of purchase intention. Procedia Economics and Finance 35:401-410.  

44 Limayem M, Khalifa M, Frini A. 2000. What makes consumers buy from Internet? A longitudinal study of online shopping. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 30:421-432.  

45 Luo Q, Forscher T, Shaheen S, Deakin E, Walker JL. 2023. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and generational heterogeneity on ecommerce shopping styles-A case study of Sacramento, California. Communications in Transportation Research 3:100091.  

46 Mahmood MA, Bagchi K, Ford TC. 2004. On-line shopping behavior: Cross-country empirical research. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 9:9-30.  

47 Malhotra NK. 2005. Marketing research: An applied orientation. 4th ed. Georgia Institute of Technology, Prentice Hall, India.  

48 Martínez-López FJ, Luna P, Martínez FJ. 2005. Online shopping, the standard learning hierarchy, and consumers’ internet expertise: An American-Spanish comparison. Internet Research 15:312-334.  

49 Monsuwé TP, Dellaert BGC, de Ruyter K. 2004. What drives consumers to shop online? A literature review. International Journal of Service Industry Management 15:102-121.  

50 Morganosky MA, Cude BJ. 2000. Consumer response to online grocery shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 28:17-26.  

51 Naseri MB, Elliott G. 2011. Role of demographics, social connectedness and prior internet experience in adoption of online shopping: Applications for direct marketing. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing 19:69-84.  

52 Nielsen. 2015. The future of grocery: E-commerce, digital technology and changing shopping preferences around the world. The Nielsen Company, New York, USA.  

53 Nguyen TTH, Nguyen N, Nguyen TBL, Phan TTH, Bui LP, Moon HC. 2019. Investigating consumer attitude and intention towards online food purchasing in an emerging economy: An extended TAM approach. Foods 8:576.  

54 Peng C. 2019. Does e-commerce reduce traffic congestion? Evidence from Alibaba single day shopping event. CEP Discussion Papers No 1646, Centre for Economic Performance. The London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.  

55 Perera GABS, Sachitra KMV. 2019. Customer satisfaction towards online shopping in Sri Lanka: Moderating effect of income level. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports 6:AJARR51510.  

56 Phan RCW, Mohammed LA. 2003. On the security & design of MyKad. pp. 721-724. In Proceeding of 9th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.03EX732), Penang, Malaysia, 2003.  

57 Quaddus M, Achjari D. 2005. A model for electronic commerce success. Telecommunication Policy 2:127-152.  

58 Rahman MF, Hossain MS. 2023. The impact of website quality on online compulsive buying behavior: Evidence from online shopping organizations. South Asian Journal of Marketing 4:1-16.  

59 Ranganathan C, Ganapathy S. 2002. Key dimensions of business-to-consumer web sites. Information and Management 39:457-465.  

60 Rathnayaka SD, Selvanathan EA, Selvanathan S. 2022. Modelling the consumption patterns in the Asian countries. Economic Analysis and Policy 74:277-296.  

61 Saleem M, Khan MM, Ahmed ME, Shah SAN, Surti SR. 2018. Online grocery shopping and consumer perception: A case of Karachi market in Pakistan. Journal of Internet and e-Business Studies 2018:931248.  

62 Sim LL, Koi SM. 2002. Singapore’s Internet shoppers and their impact on traditional shopping patterns. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 9:115-124.  

63 Smith AD, Rupp WT. 2003. Strategic online customer decision making: Leveraging the transformational power of the Internet. Online Information Review 27:418-432.  

64 Sonwaney V, Chincholkar S. 2019. Identifying the factors impacting online consumer buying behaviour. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research 8:445-456.  

65 Tandon U, Kiran R, Sah A. 2017. Analyzing customer satisfaction: Users perspective towards online shopping. Nankai Business Review International 8:266-288.  

66 Teo TSH. 2002. Attitudes toward online shopping and the Internet. Behaviour & Information Technology 21:259-271. DOI:  

67 Thananuraksakul S. 2007. Factors influencing online shopping behavior intention: A study of Thai consumers. Australian Journal of Management 5:41-46.  

68 Van Droogenbroeck E, Van Hove L. 2017. Adoption of online grocery shopping: Personal or household characteristics? Journal of Internet Commerce 16:255-286.  

69 Wang O, Somogyi S. 2019. Determinants for consumer food choice with the new retail e-commerce mode. In Proceeding of 63rd Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society (AARES) Conference, Melbourne, Australia.  

70 Wattegama C. 2021. Digital economy of Sri Lanka: National goals and lessons from the South. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. UNCTAD/BRI PROJECT/RP15. UN (United Nations), New York, USA.  

71 Yamane T. 1973. Statistics: An introduction analysis. 3rd ed. Harper & Row, New York, USA.  

72 Zuroni MJ, Goh HL. 2012. Factors influencing consumers’ attitude towards e-commerce purchases through online shopping. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 2:223-230.