Mixed and separate gender feeding influenced the growth performance for two lines of Korean native chickens when compared to a white semi-broiler and a commercial broiler from day 1 to 35 post-hatch

Research
Oketch Elijah Ogola1Hyun Min Cho1Jun Seon Hong1Yu Bin Kim1Shan Randima Nawarathne1Myunghwan Yu1Jung Min Heo1*Young-Joo Yi2*

Abstract

A comparative study was conducted to examine the effects of mixed and separate gender feeding on growth performance of Korean native chickens (KNC) against a white semi-broiler (WSB) and a commercial broiler (CB) over five weeks. 576 chicks were used with eight birds per cage in a randomized complete block design with 18 replicates per breed. For the KNC lines, three groups of male (M), female (F) and mixed-gender (FM) were used. Fresh water and feed were supplied on an ad-libitum basis. Birds were fed a standard starter (d 1 - 22) and grower diet (d 23 - 35). Body weight (BW), feed intake, and shank length (SL) were measured weekly. From the BW and feed consumed data, the average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were calculated. The commercial broiler showed higher performance (p < 0.05) for all the indices measured for the entire period. The CB group consumed more feed and were more feed-efficient thus grew faster. This group was followed by the white semi-broiler and the KNC, in order. An intra-breed comparison for KNCs revealed that the males showed better growth performance with longer SL (p < 0.05) compared to the female and mixed-gender groups. The results showed that other than the breed type, mixed and separate gender feeding impacted on the growth performance of the two lines of Korean native chickens. Males for both lines of KNC generally performed better for the parameters measured, as determined by a greater BW and reduced FCR.

Keyword



Introduction

The consumption of meat on a global scale has grown exponentially. In Korea, a typical diet that was originally comprised of grains and vegetables with the oceanic regions having fish and seaweed (Kim et al., 2016) now has more meat than ever. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD, 2020), Korea consumed around 62 kg of meat in 2019, an upwards of 51.3 kg in 2014. Within the poultry sub-sector, Korean ate 18.7 kg of poultry meat in 2019, up from 15.4 kg in 2014. In line with the recent boost in healthy living and dieting concerns, the consumption of native chicken and chicken cuts especially chicken breast has also been on the rise (Park et al., 2019). The Korean industry is largely dominated by imported commercial broilers at around 90% that are reared in intensive fattening systems (Kong et al., 2006). Their desirability could be due to faster growth rates and lean muscle accretion ability in addition to relatively lower production costs especially on a large-scale production process (Ahn and Park, 2002). This has disadvantaged the native breeds that are reported to have lower rates of growth, reduced muscle build-up ability and unreasonable pricing that has affected its popularity and threatened its existence (Lee et al., 2017). Thus, there have been intensive efforts by the National Institute of Animal Science (NIAS) to preserve 5 lines of Korean native chickens (KNC) that are distinguishable by plumage colors namely black, grey, red, yellow, and white lines. They have since been registered by the domestic animal diversity information system (DAD-IS) (Jin et al., 2014). In a recent coordinated effort by Korean governmental agencies to improve food self-sufficiency and conserve KNCs, crossbred native chicken breeds have been developed. The crossbreds from this project were used in this experiment.

Korean native chickens have been the subject of recent studies that have detailed their unique taste and flavor with high levels of amino acids and low fat thus it is preferred by older consumers who have been shown more preference for traditional foods (Jung et al., 2011; Park et al., 2019). Besides, it has a firmer texture with more cohesiveness, gumminess, and chewiness (Choe et al., 2010; Lui et al., 2012) thus it is relatively more costly than commercial broilers. It has even shown the capacity for use in the making of retorted Samgyetang (Jeong et al., 2020). White semi-broiler is a crossbreed of male broiler breeder (i.e., Ross 308) and commercial layer (i.e., Hy-Line). It is known to have white feathers, a smaller size compared to commercial broilers, low-fat meat. It is largely produced by private industries to cater for the summer season increase in demand for Samgyetang which is a young chicken carcass soup packed with glutinous rice, ginseng, and garlic as stated by Jeong et al. (2020). Therefore, due to the increased focus on Korean native chicken and the development of new crossbred lines, there is a need to determine and compare their growth performance, consumer response, economic value, and carcass characteristics with other breeds. In this light, the current study was conducted to determine and compare the effects of mixed and separate gender feeding for two lines of Korean native chickens (KNC) to a white semi-broiler (WSB) and a commercial broiler (CB) under the same environmental conditions for 5-weeks.

Materials and Methods

All experimental procedures were revised and endorsed by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Chungnam National University, Daejeon South Korea (Protocol No. 202006-CNU-080).

Birds and housing

A total of 576 birds were housed in 72 raised wire-floor cages with 18 replicates per breed used, and with 8 birds per cage in a randomized complete block design and subjected to similar conditions for 5 weeks. A total of 144 White Semi broilers, 144 Ross broilers and 288 KNC (A and B) were used. Within the lines of KNC, the birds were separated by gender and housed in three groups of 1) males only, 2) females only, and 3) mixed groups of males and females. The temperature and humidity of the experimental environment were regulated and adjusted if necessary. The birds were exposed to light throughout the experiment.

Diets and experimental design

A completely randomized block design was used. A basal diet of corn-soybean was formulated as per the NIAS (2018) standards for broiler chicken in a two-phase feeding program of a starter diet from day 1 - 21; (crude protein [CP] at 20.3%, metabolizable energy [ME] at 3,059 kcal·kg-1) and a grower diet from day 22 - 35; (CP at 18.6%, ME at 3,123 kcal·kg-1) as demonstrated in Table 1. The experimental diet and clean water were provided at all times for the entire trial period.

Table 1. Ingredients and the nutrient composition in % of the basal diet.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/images/N0030480116_image/Table_KJOAS_48_01_16_T1.png

ME, metabolizable energy; CP, crude protein

z Premix supplied the following per kg of diet: Vitamin A, 24,000 IU; vitamin D3, 6,000 IU; vitamin E, 30 IU; vitamin K, 4 mg; thiamine, 4 mg; riboflavin, 12 mg; pyridoxine, 4 mg; folate, 2 mg; biotin, 0.03 mg; vitamin B8, 0.06 mg; niacin, 90 mg; pantothenic acid, 30 mg; Fe, 80 mg (as FeSO4·H2O); Zn, 80 mg (as ZnSO4·H2O); Mn, 80 mg (as MnSO4·H2O); Co, 0.5 mg (as CoSO4·H2O); Cu, 10 mg (as CuSO4·H2O); Se, 0.2 mg (as Na2SeO3); I, 0.9 mg (as Ca(IO3)·2H2O).

Growth performance, assessment, and analyses

The body weight (BW), feed consumed, and shank lengths (SL) were measured weekly. Using the body weight and feed consumed data, the average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were calculated. The growth performance data were analyzed using the General Linear Model procedures in the SPSS software package (Version 26, IBM SPSS, Chicago, USA). Tukey's multiple range test was used to compare the significant differences between different pairs of means at (p < 0.05).

Results

All the birds exhibited normal behavior and remained healthy throughout the experimental period. The commercial Ross broiler 308 (CB) showed a superior (p < 0.05) body weight of around 1.75 kg as at week 5. This was found to be 64.3% more than the BW of the white semi-broiler (WSB) at approximately 1.06 kg. The males of KA (KA-M) had an improved (p < 0.05) BW of around 979 g compared to the female and mixed groups at 810 g and 904 g respectively. Similarly, KB males (KB-M) had higher (p < 0.05) BW of approximately 963 g compared to the female and mixed groups at 862 g and 914 g respectively. Considering the ADG, higher (p < 0.05) values were recorded for CB and WSB at roughly 50.0 and 30.0 g·day-1 respectively. The ADG for the native chicken varied accordingly at around 25.4 ± 2.0 for KA and 25.6 ± 1.4 for KB. The KNC groups ate about 51.3 ± 3.4 g·day-1 which was approximately 49% and 10% less than the figures obtained for CB and WSB that recorded elevated (p < 0.05) ADFI of about 76.8 and 56.6 g·day-1 respectively. Within the KNC, the males (KA-M and KB-M) had higher (p < 0.05) ADFI values of around 54.7 and 54.1 while that of the females (KA-F and KB-F) was the lowest at 47.7 g·day-1 and 49.8 g·day-1 respectively. For the FCR, the lowest (p < 0.05) values were similarly observed for the CB and WSB at around 1.5 and 1.9. Within the KNC, FCR values of around 2.0 were recorded with no significant differences across all the test groups for the KA and KB crossbreeds. Longer (p < 0.05) shank lengths (SL) of around 80.7, 80.6 and 80.5 were recorded for the KA-M, CB and KB-M respectively. Shorter (p < 0.05) SL of around 75.3 were recorded for KA females when compared to all the other test groups.

Discussion

Due to the increased focus on Korean native chicken based on their tastier and healthier meat, thus reported higher quality (Jayasena et al., 2013; Choo et al., 2014a; Choi et al., 2015) and the development of new crossbred lines, there is a need to determine and compare their growth performance, consumer response, economic value, and carcass characteristics with other breeds. Therefore, the present study was conducted to determine and analyze the effects of mixed and separate gender feeding on the growth performance of Korean native chickens when compared to a white semi-broiler and a commercial broiler. Generally, the growth performance was significantly affected by the breed type and sex. This effect has been thoroughly documented in the literature (Brewer et al., 2012; Fernandes et al., 2013). Table 2 shows that the commercial broilers consumed more feed and were more feed- efficient thus they grew faster during the entire experimental period. This was expected since the Ross breed has been selected for higher feed intake, high feed efficiency and faster growth rates over generations with similarly higher performance being recorded in other studies (Livingston et al., 2020). On average performance, the commercial broiler was followed by the white semi-broiler and lastly, the KNC. This is in line with previous studies that showed the relatively lower growth performance of local native breeds when compared to commercial breeds (Jaturasitha et al., 2008; Choo et al., 2014b; Magothe et al., 2012). Gender has been shown to influence the endogenous functional compounds in meat for Korean native chickens (Jayasena et al., 2015). An analysis to elucidate the effects of gender on mixed and separate gender feeding on Korean native chicken was conducted. In line with Oh et al. (2019), the males for KA and KB recorded significantly higher values for the final body weight, ADG, ADFI when compared to the mixed and female groups. The higher ADFI observed for the male test groups is in line with the general agreement that male birds require greater nutrient quantities than females (NRC, 1994). The effect of age on the difference between the sexes was also noticed as the birds grew from week 1 to week 5. A calculation of the FCR ratios to depict the efficiency of converting the feed consumed into lean muscle mass was also conducted. Desirably lower values that signify better feed efficiency and low feed wastage were observed for the WSB and the CB with no significant differences among all the test groups for KA and KB (Table 2). It was also noted that the ADFI increased with the age of the bird. This is akin to previous studies that were conducted by Shin et al. (2017) and Nawarathne et al. (2020). Generally, the FCR figures recorded for this study with KNC (KA and KB) were much lower than those recorded using the same research facilities by Shin et al. (2017) and Nawarathne et al. (2020) and Hong et al. (2018). The differences could be due to seasonal changes, the initial body weight of the birds, and the overall effect of the hybrid vigour from crossbreeding. The lower values could also be in line with the genetic progress that underlies the rapid growth of the poultry industry (Havenstein et al., 2003). Modern commercial broilers are known to be able to reach a market weight of around 2.1 kg within 35 days as of 2009 from 63 days around the 1960s (Ravindran, 2013; Zuidhof et al., 2014). Unfortunately, the rapid weight gain ability has not coincided with a proportional increase in the capacity of the skeleton and internal organs and the vascular system to support the rapidly increasing body mass (Deeb and Lamont, 2002), this has led to animal welfare, fitness and health concerns (Emmerson, 1997), especially among desirable broiler breeds with higher muscle accumulation ability and faster BW gain rates. Therefore, a further assessment was conducted for the shank lengths from the distance between the corner of the hock joint and the first scale of the third toe (Gao et al., 2006) in millimeters. In the present study, longer shank lengths with no significant differences were observed for the CB and the males for both lines of KNC (KA and KB; Table 2).

Table 2. Comparison of the growth performance indices for the Korean native chicken (KA, KB), White semi broiler (WSB) and the commercial broiler (CB) from hatch to week 5y.

http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/kjoas/images/N0030480116_image/Table_KJOAS_48_01_16_T2.png

F, female only; FM, female and male; M, male only.

y Results are mean of 18 replicates per treatment.

z Pooled standard error of mean.

a - c: Values in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The present study has established the interaction of gender and the effects of mixed and separate gender feeding on the growth performance of Korean native chickens. Males for both lines of KNC (KA and KB) generally performed better than the mixed and the female groups for indices measured. Further studies on the effect of gender on performance could vary the gender ratios under similar conditions.

Conflict of Interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the Golden Seed Project (GSP) under the Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry.

Authors Information

Oketch Elijah Ogola, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-460X

Hyun Min Cho, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9329-8824

Jun Seon Hong, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2142-9888

Yu Bin Kim, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7720-128X

Shan Randima Nawarathne, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9055-9155

Myunghwan Yu, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4479-4677

Jung Min Heo, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3693-1320

Young-Joo Yi, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7167-5123

References

1 Ahn DH, Park SY. 2002. Studies on components related to taste such as free amino acids and nucleotides in Korean native chicken meat. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 31:547-552. [in Korean]  

2 Brewer VB, Kuttappan VA, Emmert JL, Meullenet JFC, Owens CM. 2012. Big-bird programs: Effect of strain, sex, and debone time on meat quality of broilers. Poultry Science 91:248-254.  

3 Choe JH, Nam KC, Jung S, Kim BN, Yun HJ, Jo CR. 2010. Differences in the quality characteristics between commercial Korean native chickens and broilers. Food Science of Animal Resources 30:13-19.  

4 Choi NR, Seo DW, Jemaa SB, Sultana H, Heo KN, Jo C, Lee JH. 2015. Discrimination of the commercial Korean native chicken population using microsatellite markers. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 57:1-8.  

5 Choo YK, Kwon HJ, Oh ST, Um JS, Kim BG, Kang CW, Lee SK, An BK. 2014a. Comparison of growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Korean local chickens and silky fowl. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 27:398.  

6 Choo YK, Oh ST, Lee KW, Kang CW, Kim HW, Kim CJ, Kim EJ, Kim HS, An BK. 2014b. The growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of egg-type male growing chicken and white-mini broiler in comparison with commercial broiler (Ross 308). Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources 34:622.  

7 Deeb N, Lamont SJ. 2002. Genetic architecture of growth and body composition in unique chicken populations. Journal of Heredity 93:107-118.  

8 Emmerson DA. 1997. Commercial approaches to genetic selection for growth and feed conversion in domestic poultry. Poultry Science 76:1121-1125.  

9 Fernandes JIM, Bortoluzzi C, Triques GE, Neto AFG, Peiter DC. 2013. Effect of strain, sex and age on carcass parameters of broilers. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences 35:99-105.  

10 Gao Y, Hu XX, Du ZQ, Deng XM, Huang YH, Fei J, Feng JD, Liu ZL, Da Y, Li N. 2006. A genome scan for quantitative trait loci associated with body weight at different developmental stages in chickens. Animal Genetics 37:276-278.  

11 Havenstein GB, Ferket PR, Qureshi MA. 2003. Growth, livability, and feed conversion of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poultry Science 82:1500-1508.  

12 Hong JS, Cho HM, Wickramasuriya SS, Shin TK, Kim EJ, Heo JM, Yi YJ. 2018. Growth performance of Korean crossbred domestic chickens for 12 weeks after post hatching. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 45:733-739. [in Korean]  

13 Jaturasitha S, Srikanchai T, Kreuzer M, Wicke M. 2008. Differences in carcass and meat characteristics between chicken indigenous to northern Thailand (Black-boned and Thai native) and imported extensive breeds (Bresse and Rhode Island Red). Poultry Science 87:160-169.  

14 Jayasena DD, Jung S, Kim HJ, Bae YS, Yong HI, Lee JH, Kim JG, Jo C. 2013. Comparison of quality traits of meat from Korean native chickens and broilers used in two different traditional Korean cuisines. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 26:1038-1046.  

15 Jayasena DD, Jung S, Kim SH, Kim HJ, Alahakoon AU, Lee JH, Jo C. 2015. Endogenous functional compounds in Korean native chicken meat are dependent on sex, thermal processing and meat cut. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 95:771-775.  

16 Jeong HS, Utama DK, Kim J, Barido FH, Lee SK. 2020. Quality comparison of retorted Samgyetang made from white semi-broilers, commercial broilers, Korean native chickens, and old laying hens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 33:139-147.  

17 Jin S, Park HB, Seo DW, Cahyadi M, Choi NR, Heo KN, Jo C, Lee JH. 2014. Association of MC1R genotypes with shank color traits in Korean native chicken. Livestock Science 170:1-7.  

18 Jung YK, Jeon HJ, Jung S, Choe JH, Lee JH, Heo KN, Kang BS, Jo CR. 2011. Comparison of quality traits of thigh meat from Korean native chickens and broilers. Food Science of Animal Resources 31:684-692.  

19 Kim SH, Kim MS, Lee MS, Park YS, Lee HJ, Kang SA, Lee HS, Lee KE, Yang HJ, Kim MJ, Lee YE, Kwon DY. 2016. Korean diet: Characteristics and historical background. Journal of Ethnic Foods 3:26-31.  

20 Kong HS, Oh JD, Lee JH, Jo KJ, Sang BD, Choi CH, Kim SD, Lee SJ, Yeon SH, Jeon GJ, Lee HK. 2006. Genetic variation and relationships of Korean native chickens and foreign breeds using 15 microsatellite markers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 19:1546-1550.  

21 Lee MA, Jung Y, Jo C, Park JY, Nam KC. 2017. Analysis of Consumers’ Preferences and Price Sensitivity to Native Chickens. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources 37:469-476.  

22 Livingston ML, Cowieson AJ, Crespo R, Hoang V, Nogal B, Browning M, Livingston KA. 2020. Effect of broiler genetics, age, and gender on performance and blood chemistry. Heliyon 6:e04400.  

23 Lui XD, Jayasena DD, Jung Y, Jung S, Kang BS, Heo KN, Lee JH, Jo C. 2012. Differential proteome analysis of breast and thigh muscles between Korean native chickens and commercial broilers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 25:895-902.  

24 Magothe TM, Okeno TO, Muhuyi WB, Kahi AK. 2012. Indigenous chicken production in Kenya: II. Prospects for research and development. World's Poultry Science Journal 68:133-144.  

25 Nawarathne SR, Lee SK, Cho HM, Wickramasuriya SS, Hong JS, Kim YB, Heo JM, Yi YJ. 2020. Determination and comparison of growth performance parameters between two crossbred strains of Korean native chickens with a white semi broiler chicken for 84 days post-hatch. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 47:255-262.  

26 NIAS (National Institute of Animal Science, Korea). 2018. Korean feeding standard for poultry. NIAS, Wanju, Korea. [in Korean]  

27 NRC (National Research Council). 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry, 9th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.  

28 OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2020. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2020-2029. OECD Publishing, Paris/FAO, Rome, Italy. doi.org/10.1787/1112c23b-en.  

29 Oh SM, Yoon SY, Lee JY, Jeon SM, Oh DY, Ha JJ, Song YH, Kim JS. 2019. Effects of mixed or split-sex feeding on growth performance and behavior of Korean Native Chicken (KNC). Gyeongsangbuk-do Livestock Research Institute, Yeongju, Korea. [in Korean]  

30 Park S, Ki N, Jang Y, Lee D, Moon J. 2019. Poultry industry trends and consumer analysis in Korea: Native Korean chicken and processed chicken. Agribusiness and Information Management 11:25-34.  

31 Ravindran V. 2013. Poultry feed availability and nutrition in developing countries. Poultry development review 2:60-63.  

32 Shin TK, Wickramasuriya SS, Kim E, Cho HM, Heo JM, Yi YJ. 2017. Comparative study of growth performances of six different Korean native chicken crossbreeds from hatch to twelve weeks of age. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 44:244-253. [in Korean]  

33 Zuidhof MJ, Schneider BL, Carney VL, Korver DR, Robinson FE. 2014. Growth, efficiency, and yield of commercial broilers from 1957, 1978, and 2005. Poultry Science 93:2970-2982.